Individual 64465's submission
CAN-ASC-2.2 – Emergency Egress (Exit)
Feedback items
Item id
1767987352015_175
Heading id
s13.2.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Section 13.2.1 discusses the effectiveness of visible signal devices for waking sleeping people. However, the standard limits visible signal requirements to fire alarm systems, which are typically not installed inside sleeping rooms where they would be needed. This leaves a gap for residential suites that rely on standalone smoke alarms.
What should we change it to?
Expand Section 13.2.1 to include a requirement that smoke alarms installed in sleeping rooms or within residential suites must incorporate a visual signaling device conforming to CAN/ULC‑S526, not just building fire alarm systems. Proposed concept wording:
“Where sleeping accommodations are provided, smoke alarms installed in these rooms or suites shall include a visual signaling component conforming to CAN/ULC‑S526, in addition to audible signaling.” refer to attached file
Why should we change it?
Fire alarm systems are usually located in corridors or common areas, not inside bedrooms. Therefore, their visual signals cannot reliably wake sleeping people, including those with hearing impairments.
Residential suites rely on standalone smoke alarms—this is where visual signaling is actually needed. Ontario addressed this gap in its 2015 Building Code by requiring visible signaling on smoke alarms inside sleeping rooms, demonstrating precedent and feasibility.
Adding this requirement improves accessibility and safety for hearing‑impaired residents and better aligns the standard with its stated intent to ensure effective waking from sleep.
Heading text
13.2.1 Alerting or signaling devices
Heading number portion
13.2.1
Item id
1767987610669_580
Heading id
s13.1.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Section 13.1.4 states that when a fire alarm system is not provided, the visible signaling system must consist of strobes conforming to CAN/ULC‑S526. This excludes the option of using smoke alarms that already incorporate visual signaling technology.
What should we change it to?
Allow or require smoke alarms with integrated visual signaling devices as an acceptable method of compliance when no fire alarm system exists.
Proposed concept wording: “Where a fire alarm system is not provided, compliance may be achieved through the installation of smoke alarms incorporating visual signaling devices conforming to CAN/ULC‑S526.” (refer to attached file
Why should we change it?
Standalone strobe systems can add cost and complexity without providing an audible signal at the point of hazard detection. Smoke alarms with integrated strobes provide both audible and visible alerts directly in the room, offering improved accessibility and cost‑effective compliance.
This approach is already in use in Ontario’s Building Code and would ensure consistent accessibility across provinces and territories.
Heading text
13.1.4 Where a fire alarm system is not provided
Heading number portion
13.1.4
Item id
1767988002488_721
Heading id
s7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The current scope in Section 7.1(a) applies to “all new buildings,” but does not clearly address new single‑family homes, which typically lack fire alarm systems and rely solely on smoke alarms.
What should we change it to?
Clarify that the accessibility intent of the standard applies to dwellings without fire alarm systems by referencing smoke alarms with visual signaling in these smaller residential buildings.
Proposed concept wording: “For new dwelling units not equipped with a fire alarm system, smoke alarms installed in required locations shall incorporate visual signaling conforming to CAN/ULC‑S526 to ensure accessible alerting.” (refer to attached file)
Why should we change it?
Most new Canadian homes are single‑family dwellings whose only fire detection devices are smoke alarms. Without explicit language, these homes fall outside the standard’s accessibility improvements.
Adding this clarification ensures that Canadians in all types of residences, not just large multi‑unit buildings, benefit from accessible alerting.
This also aligns with Ontario’s existing requirement and supports national consistency in accessible fire safety.
Heading text
7.1 Inclusions
Heading number portion
7.1
Submission ID
64465
Submitted by
CBambi