• Skip to main content
  • Skip to "About government"

Language switcher

  • Françaisfr
Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

Search Accessbility Standards Canada


Use the Left and Right arrow keys to navigate between the top level menu items. Press the ENTER key or double tap the SPACEBAR to select a menu item. To navigate through a sub menu, Press the SPACEBAR or the Down arrow key. Use the Up and Down arrow keys to navigate through submenu items. Press the Enter or SPACEBAR to select a submenu item. Press the ESCAPE key to close the submenu and return to the top level.

Main navigation

  • Home
    • About us
    • Accessibility Plan 2025
    • Get involved
    • Reports and publications
    • Transparency
    • Consultations
    • Organizational structure
  • Accessibility standards
    • Standards and technical guides database
    • Standards under public review
    • Technical committees
    • Work program
  • Funding research
    • Funded research project database
  • Centre of Expertise
  • Contact us
  • Login

Mobile Menu

  • Home
    • About us
    • Accessibility Plan 2025
    • Get involved
    • Reports and publications
    • Transparency
    • Consultations
    • Organizational structure
  • Accessibility standards
    • Standards and technical guides database
    • Standards under public review
    • Technical committees
    • Work program
  • Funding research
    • Funded research project database
  • Centre of Expertise
  • Contact us
  • Login

You are here

  1. Canada.ca
  2. Accessibility Standards Canada
  3. Search results

Search results


Displaying 641 - 650 of 785

Individual 65444's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1779980207095_973
Heading id
10.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
The childcare centre shall be located such that the path from parking, transit, and drop-off zones to the building main entrance comply with the requirements of CSA/ASC B651:23, unless otherwise specified in this standard.
What should we change it to?
The childcare centre shall be located such that the path(s) from parking, transit, and drop-off zones to the building main entrance comply with the requirements of CSA/ASC B651:23, unless otherwise specified in this standard.
Why should we change it?
Recommend pluralizing path to paths; there may be more than one. There is no guarantee that the parking, transit and drop off zones are all in the same place.
Heading text
10.1 Accessible sites
Heading number portion
10.1
Item id
1779980249698_169
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
At least one drop-off and pick-up zone shall serve as a childcare centre
What should we change it to?
At least one drop-off and pick-up zone shall serve a childcare centre
Why should we change it?
Delete the word “as” – grammatically nonsensical.
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1779980300487_356
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
b) provide an access aisle at street level, a minimum of 1,500 mm wide and 14,000 mm long to accommodate two vehicles; c) be separated from the walkway by a curb, tactile attention indicator surface, or other physical indicators; d) where applicable, have access from the street level access aisle to the raised curb area via a depressed curb ramp that runs for the length of the drop-off zone that complies with clause 8.3.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23;
What should we change it to?
Consider making items b-d in Clause 10.3 “should” statements, not “shall” statements.
Why should we change it?
Would this clause as a whole actually hinder or restrict the placement of a childcare site? This clause is very difficult to implement under many circumstances. Particularly for childcare centres leasing space in commercial or apartment buildings, the availability of the space described is at the discretion of the developer/property manager, and may not actually exist.
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1779980353300_629
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
b) provide an access aisle at street level, a minimum of 1,500 mm wide and 14,000 mm long to accommodate two vehicles; c) be separated from the walkway by a curb, tactile attention indicator surface, or other physical indicators; d) where applicable, have access from the street level access aisle to the raised curb area via a depressed curb ramp that runs for the length of the drop-off zone that complies with clause 8.3.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23;
What should we change it to?
Also, would there be a way to encourage workarounds when b-d are not feasible? For example, the use of extra parking spaces near TWSIs and curb cuts?
Why should we change it?
Workarounds may be possible, but seem to be inappropriate, given how the standard is phrased. Why not add an item that facilitates the development of a workaround or workarounds, if b-d are not feasible?
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1779980411347_380
Heading id
s11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
have illumination at least 50 lx at ground level
What should we change it to?
have illumination at least 50 lx at ground level during the hours of operation of the childcare centre, and in all weather conditions
Why should we change it?
Clarify that the minimum of 50 lx is for all hours of operation of the childcare centre. Ambient natural illumination changes substantially depending on time of day, time of year, and inclement weather. Consider a childcare centre in Yellowknife at 4 pm in December and in the middle of a snow storm, compared to the same location on a summer day in July at the same time.
Heading text
11.2 Main entrance
Heading number portion
11.2
Item id
1779980462763_600
Heading id
s11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
have a service dog relief area that complies with clause 9.4 of CAN-ASC-5.2.1.
What should we change it to?
No change recommended to this item. A new requirement is proposed for Clause 14.2, which will be covered in a separate comment.
Why should we change it?
This requirement is commendable – however, service dogs may be used by parents and visitors to the centre, as well as by staff. There is currently no provision for where the service dog rests indoors when not with its handler (which, particularly for staff, absolutely can and does happen). The location for that requirement is likely not here, but rather in Clause 14.2.
Heading text
11.2 Main entrance
Heading number portion
11.2
Item id
1779980510934_552
Heading id
s11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
have a service dog relief area that complies with clause 9.4 of CAN-ASC-5.2.1.
What should we change it to?
have a service dog relief area that complies with clause 13.4 of CAN-ASC-5.2.1.
Why should we change it?
Corrects numbering to the appropriate value (the clauses in 5.2.1 were renumbered to match the current standard layout for ASC standards – you should validate this with the committee’s PM).
Heading text
11.2 Main entrance
Heading number portion
11.2
Item id
1779980556699_974
Heading id
s11.2.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The main entrance to the building leading to the childcare centre, and the main entrance to the childcare centre shall have doorways with: a. power-assisted doors that comply with clause 5.2.9 of CSA/ASC B651:23; b. controls to allow for accessibility, while also maintaining the security and safety of the children in attendance; and c. a clear opening width of at least 950 mm complying with CAN-ASC-2.3.
What should we change it to?
Add a new item d: d. no interference from any other door or gate that may be adjacent to the main entrance.
Why should we change it?
Some childcare centres with their own exterior doors also have gates to play areas adjacent to the main entrance. In these cases, it’s important to ensure that the two doorways (or the door and the gate) don’t interfere with each other if they are opened simultaneously – or that the opening of one does not block the ability to open the second.
Heading text
11.2.1 Power-assisted doors and door width
Heading number portion
11.2.1
Item id
1779980612760_942
Heading id
11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge; and d. be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
What should we change it to?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge; and d. be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments. Note 2: The main entrance to the childcare facility might also be an emergency exit.
Why should we change it?
Could one of the emergency exits be the main entrance? If yes, a second note would be perhaps the best way to make this point.
Heading text
11.3 Emergency egress
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1779980680216_795
Heading id
11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge; and d. be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
What should we change it to?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge; and d. be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual disabilities.
Why should we change it?
Recommend staying away from the term “impairments” which medicalizes disability lived experiences. “Hearing and visual disabilities” would be OK.
Heading text
11.3 Emergency egress
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1779980737747_637
Heading id
11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge; and d. be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
What should we change it to?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; and c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge. The childcare centre emergency egress should be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
Why should we change it?
Is item d always going to be practical? It is possible for a childcare facility to have emergency exits on opposite ends of the same side of the space (for example, if it is located in the middle of a row of units, and surrounded on three sides). Consider making it a should statement instead of a shall.
Heading text
11.3 Emergency egress
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1779980788811_784
Heading id
11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The childcare centre emergency egress shall: a. comprise an accessible egress path of travel as per Clause 11.3.1; b. comprise emergency provisions as per clause 5.7 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. include a minimum of two emergency exits to the exterior of the childcare facility or to an area of refuge; and d. be located on different sides of the childcare centre. Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
What should we change it to?
Add a new item to this clause: There shall be a minimum of 2 emergency egress pathways to the exterior of the childcare centre.
Why should we change it?
Item d also implies that there needs to be at least two emergency egress points. Recommend that this also be explicitly stated.
Heading text
11.3 Emergency egress
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1779980842091_377
Heading id
11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
What should we change it to?
Childcare centres, in their emergency procedures, shall: a) include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments; and b) Comply with CAN/ASC 2.2 – Emergency Egress
Why should we change it?
Two suggested changes – one would be to point to the Emergency Egress standard (if it is published before this one is finished). And the second would be to make this note an actual requirement, if within scope of the standard.
Heading text
11.3 Emergency egress
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1779980885841_30
Heading id
11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
What should we change it to?
Note: Emergency procedures should include provisions for assisting children and staff with physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities, including designated staff roles, accessible evacuation devices (where applicable), and clear communication strategies for children with hearing or visual impairments.
Why should we change it?
CAN/ASC 2.2 requires personalized emergency evacuation plans (PEEPs) for all users of a site – perhaps it’s also out of scope for this standard, but it is worth commenting somewhere that emergency evacuation procedures need to be posted in a public place, and there needs to be provisions in place for staff with disabilities, not just children. How parents and visitors with disabilities are accounted for is more likely in scope for a standard that looks at service provision at a childcare centre.
Heading text
11.3 Emergency egress
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1779980934021_931
Heading id
12.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Paths of travel that do not form part of the emergency path of travel shall comply with clause 5 of CSA/ASC B651:23 and shall include tactile wayfinding supports, such as tactile walking surface indicators.
What should we change it to?
Paths of travel that do not form part of the emergency path of travel shall: a) comply with clause 5 of CSA/ASC B651:23; and b) include tactile wayfinding supports, such as tactile walking surface indicators.
Why should we change it?
Editorial rewrite to make this a list, for ease of reference.
Heading text
12.1.1 Paths of travel
Heading number portion
12.1.1
Item id
1779980972471_588
Heading id
12.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Paths of travel that do not form part of the emergency path of travel shall comply with clause 5 of CSA/ASC B651:23 and shall include tactile wayfinding supports, such as tactile walking surface indicators.
What should we change it to?
The choice of language is up to the committee. One possibility would be to include a note about seasonal carpeting: Note: seasonal carpeting is itself a form of (not ideal) tactile walking surface indicator, since it tends to be laid down along the path of travel. Alternatively, if the choice is to explicitly recommend against seasonal carpeting, that should be a requirement.
Why should we change it?
What about the use of seasonal carpeting? This requirement seems to assume year round flooring, without use of seasonal carpeting. Notably, seasonal carpeting is itself a form of (not ideal) tactile walking surface indicator, since it tends to be laid down along the path of travel. If the intent is to recommend against the use of seasonal carpeting, this needs to be made explicit.
Heading text
12.1.1 Paths of travel
Heading number portion
12.1.1
Item id
1779981017525_191
Heading id
12.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The dimensions of a stationary position for people using a wheeled mobility device shall be: a. no less than 820 mm by 1,390 mm where it serves a single person (e.g., child, staff, parent, or guardian); and b. no less than 1,600 mm by 1,390 mm where it serves two people at the same time (e.g., teacher and child, parent / guardian and child, etc.).
What should we change it to?
No change to this clause
Why should we change it?
Recommend defining the term “Stationary Position” in the definitions. Childcare centre staff who are planning to use this standard are not likely to know the term.
Heading text
12.1.1 Paths of travel
Heading number portion
12.1.1
Item id
1779981053131_287
Heading id
12.1.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Wayfinding and signage shall comply with Clause 17.
What should we change it to?
Delete.
Why should we change it?
Is this not redundant? Why not simply move Clause 17 forward in the standard to make it clear that it applies everywhere? Or integrate the language directly from Clause 17 here, and then have a separate piece on wayfinding and signage in Clause 16?
Heading text
12.1.3 Wayfinding and signage
Heading number portion
12.1.3
Item id
1779981143537_715
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The number and type of childcare activity spaces within a childcare centre depend on its policies and program focus. However, a childcare centre shall have a space for at least: a. one classroom; b. one therapy room; and c. one quiet room.
What should we change it to?
See attached document restructuring Clause 12.4
Why should we change it?
From the perspective of staff who run childcare centres, the minimum requirement for space would be a multi-functional room, which can be converted into a classroom, a therapy room, a quiet space, etc. Multi-functional rooms have open-ended utilization, and promote flexibility to meet children’s needs on an as-needed and individualized basis. Additionally, there are staffing considerations childcare centre directors need to account for in considering the mumber of separate rooms onsite – each room requires a minimum number of staff, alongside the requirements for staff to child ratio.
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1779981192905_174
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Usage of the term “room”
What should we change it to?
Replace “room” with “space”
Why should we change it?
The clause, as written, uses the term room, as opposed to the more general term “space” – yet, the committee notes that, for instance, a therapy “room” doesn’t have to be a room, as long as a space in a multi-functional set up can be carved out with the appropriate dividers. To avoid the confusion of the reader, recommend using the more general term “space” (which could be a separate room, but doesn’t have to be).
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1779981238857_999
Heading id
12.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
All classrooms in a childcare centre shall: a. comply with Clause 15.3; b. be designed to accommodate a specific or maximum number of children, teachers, and staff; c. provide non-overlapping stationary position clear space as per Clause 12.1.2 for the number of people to be accommodated as per item b) of this Clause; d. provide at least one turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm permitted to overlap with the stationary positions
What should we change it to?
No suggested change to the language; see attached file for suggestions on how to re-organize this clause to be more easily readable
Why should we change it?
These four items are repeated throughout 12.4.1-12.4.6. Suggest pulling them out and making them a “general requirements” list at the beginning of the overall clause.
Heading text
12.4.1 Classrooms and learning spaces
Heading number portion
12.4.1
Item id
1779981284650_716
Heading id
12.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
“Classrooms and learning spaces”
What should we change it to?
“Classrooms” [delete reference to learning spaces] OR “Learning Spaces” AND insert a definition in Clause 9
Why should we change it?
“Learning space” seems to be the more general term than classroom, unless it is being thought of differently. Recommend defining it, or taking it out, since it’s not used consistently throughout the standard.
Heading text
12.4.1 Classrooms and learning spaces
Heading number portion
12.4.1
Item id
1779981376400_743
Heading id
12.4.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Note 2: Flexibility in the design of multi-purpose and multi-functional spaces allows for the efficient use of spaces where the childcare centre space is limited, demographics are not known, or demographics are non-specific. The designer is encouraged to design spaces that comply with as many requirements as possible in Clause 12.4 to maximize the possible utility and flexibility of the space.
What should we change it to?
Note 2: Flexibility in the design of multi-purpose and multi-functional spaces allows for the efficient use of spaces where the childcare centre space is limited, demographics are not known, or demographics are non-specific. The designer is encouraged to design spaces that comply with as many requirements as possible in Clause 12.4 to maximize the possible utility and flexibility of the space.
Why should we change it?
No change to text; recommend a change in location, given the proposed reorganization of Clause 12.4 See attached file for placement.
Heading text
12.4.2 Therapy rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.2
Item id
1779981408743_400
Heading id
12.4.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
be designed to accommodate a specific and known number of children, teachers, and staff but not less than two people (e.g., one therapist and one child);
What should we change it to?
be designed to accommodate a specific and maximum number of children, teachers, and staff but not less than two people (e.g., one therapist and one child);
Why should we change it?
Change wording to be consistent with the language in the other room requirements. Practically, for childcare centre staff using this standard, there is no meaningful difference between “specific and known” and “specific and maximum.”
Heading text
12.4.2 Therapy rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.2
Item id
1779981450300_849
Heading id
12.4.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Note 5: Flexibility in the design of multi-purpose and multi-functional spaces allows for the efficient use of spaces where the childcare centre space is limited, demographics are not known, or demographics are non-specific. The designer is encouraged to design spaces that comply with as many requirements as possible in Clause 12.4 to maximize the possible utility and flexibility of the space.
What should we change it to?
Delete
Why should we change it?
No change to text; recommend a change in location, given the proposed reorganization of Clause 12.4 (Move this language to a “general room requirements” section) See attached file for placement.
Heading text
12.4.3 Music rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.3
Item id
1779981498637_680
Heading id
12.4.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note 5: Accessible instrument storage should not obstruct egress paths and should comply with fire safety and emergency egress requirements of the AHJ.
What should we change it to?
Note 5: Accessible instrument storage should not obstruct egress paths and should comply with fire safety and emergency egress requirements of the AHJ.
Why should we change it?
Why not make this a requirement? It reads as if it were a critical piece, as it has to do with egress and safety. (No change to wording recommended – having it stay as a pair of “should” requirements would be OK.)
Heading text
12.4.3 Music rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.3
Item id
1779981538547_661
Heading id
12.4.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Note: Flexibility in the design of multi-purpose and multi-functional spaces allows for the efficient use of spaces where the childcare centre space is limited, demographics are not known, or demographics are non-specific. The designer is encouraged to design spaces that comply with as many requirements as possible in Clause 12.4 to maximize the possible utility and flexibility of the space.
What should we change it to?
Delete
Why should we change it?
No change to text; recommend a change in location, given the proposed reorganization of Clause 12.4 (Move this language to a “general room requirements” section) See attached file for placement.
Heading text
12.4.4 Sensory rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.4
Item id
1779981585190_127
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
be designed to accommodate a maximum of two people;
What should we change it to?
The wording change is limited to the number of people the room is built to hold at maximum
Why should we change it?
Why only 2 people? This would imply that a student and a staff person are in the room simultaneously, and no more than that.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1779981631974_288
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
provide a “safety bed and chair” within the space
What should we change it to?
Add a note describing what this is
Why should we change it?
What is a “safety bed and chair?” This terminology is unclear and needs to be defined. Has the committee checked this requirement against provincial public health and childcare guidance to ensure that this requirement aligns with existing policies?
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1779981687114_860
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Note 2: Flexibility in the design of multi-purpose and multi-functional spaces allows for the efficient use of spaces where the childcare centre space is limited, demographics are not known, or demographics are non-specific. The designer is encouraged to design spaces that comply with as many requirements as possible in Clause 12.4 to maximize the possible utility and flexibility of the space.
What should we change it to?
Delete
Why should we change it?
No change to text; recommend a change in location, given the proposed reorganization of Clause 12.4 (Move this language to a “general room requirements” section) See attached file for placement.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1780076056716_218
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Clause 12.4.6 and Clause 12.4.7
What should we change it to?
No recommended changes to text
Why should we change it?
In streamlining how Clause 12.4 is structured, recommend placing the two sections on multi-purpose and multi-functional rooms directly after a new general requirements section. See attached document for new suggested organization of this clause.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1780076162716_38
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Clause 12.4.6 and 12.4.7 (Language from 12.4.6 only) Multi-purpose rooms shall be designed to accommodate a variety of activities and adaptive uses. They may function as a sensory room, quiet room, play area, classroom, therapy room, meeting room, or dining area.
What should we change it to?
(Edited language from 12.4.6 only) Multi-purpose rooms shall be designed to accommodate a variety of activities and adaptive uses, one use at a time.
Why should we change it?
The distinction between a multi-purpose space and a multi-functional space is not clear in the current draft of this standard. It took several readings of the text to determine that a multi-purpose room can have many different, but sequential, uses, while a multi-functional room can have many different, but simultaneous uses. Commonly, childcare centres will have rooms that function as both a multi-purpose room and a multi-functional room, in that many different activities can be supported both simultaneously and sequentially.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1780076208826_623
Heading id
12.4.8
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Spaces that are primarily designated for movement between adjacent rooms and spaces that are less than 1,800 mm in length shall: a. except as stated in item b) in this Clause below, comply with Clause 12.1.1 after the installation of all furniture, equipment, etc. (e.g., trash bins, office supply cabinets, mini fridges, etc.); or b. have a minimum clear width of 1,600 mm. Note: A clear width dimension of 1,800 mm is preferred to allow multiple wheeled mobility device users (e.g., teacher and child) to navigate the hallways more easily.
What should we change it to?
No recommended change to text
Why should we change it?
It was unclear on several read-throughs what this clause refers to. It doesn’t seem to refer to corridors, but rather to interstitial pathways between rooms, which may also contain furniture or other items. The committee should consider adding a note to provide greater clarity on what it was envisioning for these types of spaces, and how they differ from other spaces within a childcare centre.
Heading text
12.4.8 Space and movement considerations
Heading number portion
12.4.8
Item id
1780076336368_982
Heading id
12.4.9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
c) be adjustable between 400 mm and at least 1,100 mm when they are intended to be used by both;
What should we change it to?
be adjustable between 400 mm and at least 860 mm when they are intended to be used by both;
Why should we change it?
The max height for adults only use is 860 mm, from item a. Why this greater height for combined use?
Heading text
12.4.9.1 Adjustable tables and desks
Heading number portion
12.4.9.1
Item id
1780076392732_374
Heading id
12.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Indoor play areas and recreation zones
What should we change it to?
Provide a less ambiguous title and description for what this clause refers to – or consider integrating it into the relevant sections of 12.4.
Why should we change it?
Can we define what an indoor play area is? A lot of play happens in what would be considered to be a classroom or a multi-purpose/multi-function room, so how is the notion of a play area or recreation zone different from that? Is this referring to an indoor gymnasium space?
Heading text
12.5 Indoor play areas and recreation zones
Heading number portion
12.5
Item id
1780076437199_425
Heading id
12.5.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Sensory zones
What should we change it to?
Consider integrating the requirements into the appropriate clause for sensory spaces in Clause 12.4, and deleting this section.
Why should we change it?
Are these intended to be sensory zones inside a gymnasium like space? Why not simply merge this set of requirements with those for sensory rooms in Clause 12.4?
Heading text
12.5.2 Sensory zones
Heading number portion
12.5.2
Item id
1780076512755_269
Heading id
12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Bathrooms shall: a. where intended for staff and other adults: i. comply with clause 6.2 of CSA/ASC B651:23; or ii. comply with clause 6.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23 for universal washrooms. b. where intended for children and adults: i. comply with clause 6.2.6.1 a) of CSA/ASC B651:23 except the toilet fixtures shall have the top located between 250 mm and 280 mm above finished floor; ii. have stall privacy screens and doors no higher than 150 mm from the floor; iii. have shatterproof mirrors complying with CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86; iv. have sanitary disposal receptacles that are not foot activated, are operable with a closed fist, and that are installed on the wall near the front of the toilet; and v. have sharps disposal containers installed at a maximum height of 1,100 mm from the finished floor, where provided. Note 1: For adult-assisted toileting spaces, adjustable-height toilets should be provided where feasible, to accommodate diverse needs, including mixed-age users and those requiring assistance. Note 2: The emergency call system should be located within reach of being seated on the toilet and 300 mm above the floor.
What should we change it to?
Bathrooms shall: a. where intended for staff and other adults: i. comply with clause 6.2 of CSA/ASC B651:23; or ii. comply with clause 6.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23 for universal washrooms. b. where intended for use by children, with adult assistance: i. comply with clause 6.2.6.1 a) of CSA/ASC B651:23 except the toilet fixtures shall have the top located between 250 mm and 280 mm above finished floor; ii. have stall privacy screens and doors no higher than 150 mm from the floor; iii. have shatterproof mirrors complying with CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86; iv. have sanitary disposal receptacles that are not foot activated, are operable with a closed fist, and that are installed on the wall near the front of the toilet; and v. have sharps disposal containers installed at a maximum height of 1,100 mm from the finished floor, where provided. Note 1: For adult-assisted toileting spaces, adjustable-height toilets should be provided where feasible, to accommodate diverse needs, including mixed-age users and those requiring assistance. Note 2: The emergency call system should be located within reach of being seated on the toilet and 300 mm above the floor.
Why should we change it?
12.6.1b initially read as if both children and adults would use the toilet facilities in the same bathroom. We do not believe this was the intent, as that use case would never happen in non-home based childcare facility. Was the intent, rather, to have 12.6.1b refer to bathrooms used by children, with adult assistance or supervision? If yes, a simple wording change as recommended would address this.
Heading text
12.6.1 Accessible bathrooms
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1780076577254_996
Heading id
12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
where intended for children and adults: i. comply with clause 6.2.6.1 a) of CSA/ASC B651:23 except the toilet fixtures shall have the top located between 250 mm and 280 mm above finished floor; ii. have stall privacy screens and doors no higher than 150 mm from the floor; iii. have shatterproof mirrors complying with CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86; iv. have sanitary disposal receptacles that are not foot activated, are operable with a closed fist, and that are installed on the wall near the front of the toilet; and v. have sharps disposal containers installed at a maximum height of 1,100 mm from the finished floor, where provided.
What should we change it to?
where intended for use by children under the age of 6 years, with adult assistance: i. comply with clause 6.2.6.1 a) of CSA/ASC B651:23 except the toilet fixtures shall have the top located between 250 mm and 280 mm above finished floor; and ii. have shatterproof mirrors complying with CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86 where intended for use by children over the age of 6 years, with or without adult assistance: i. comply with clause 6.2.6.1 a) of CSA/ASC B651:23 except the toilet fixtures shall have the top located between 250 mm and 280 mm above finished floor; ii. have stall privacy screens and doors no higher than 150 mm from the floor; iii. have shatterproof mirrors complying with CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86; iv. have sanitary disposal receptacles that are not foot activated, are operable with a closed fist, and that are installed on the wall near the front of the toilet; and v. have sharps disposal containers installed at a maximum height of 1,100 mm from the finished floor, where provided.
Why should we change it?
Items ii, iv and v in this list do not apply for bathrooms intended for use by children under the age of 5 or 6 years. Older children would need privacy screens in shared bathrooms, true – but that use case needs to be separated out and given its own requirement.
Heading text
12.6.1 Accessible bathrooms
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1780076631406_136
Heading id
12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Bathrooms shall: a. where intended for staff and other adults: i. comply with clause 6.2 of CSA/ASC B651:23; or ii. comply with clause 6.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23 for universal washrooms. b. where intended for children and adults: i. comply with clause 6.2.6.1 a) of CSA/ASC B651:23 except the toilet fixtures shall have the top located between 250 mm and 280 mm above finished floor; ii. have stall privacy screens and doors no higher than 150 mm from the floor; iii. have shatterproof mirrors complying with CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86; iv. have sanitary disposal receptacles that are not foot activated, are operable with a closed fist, and that are installed on the wall near the front of the toilet; and v. have sharps disposal containers installed at a maximum height of 1,100 mm from the finished floor, where provided. Note 1: For adult-assisted toileting spaces, adjustable-height toilets should be provided where feasible, to accommodate diverse needs, including mixed-age users and those requiring assistance. Note 2: The emergency call system should be located within reach of being seated on the toilet and 300 mm above the floor.
What should we change it to?
Recommendation for the committee to create a new requirement, with appropriate space considerations to account for adult assistance of children in the bathroom.
Why should we change it?
Missing from the set of requirements around accessible bathrooms is guidance around sufficient space for adults (especially adults who may use mobility aids) to assist children (especially children who use mobility aids). Clearance between toilets, for example, that allows an adult in between them. Width of the floor area separating toilets from sinks. Related to this issue is the notion that in practice, these are shared bathroom facilities that are in use by the children, and they should be designed with a specific and maximum number of children and adults in mind (similar to language used in Clause 12.4).
Heading text
12.6.1 Accessible bathrooms
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1780076679799_44
Heading id
12.6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
have an adjustable table with the option to be lowered to 300 mm in height from the floor;
What should we change it to?
Consider making this a “should” statement, rather than a “shall” – OR, provide details on adjustable height change tables that meet the requirement in a note.
Why should we change it?
In principle, this is a good requirement – in practice, it is very difficult to implement in a childcare centre without additional guidance that accounts for the practical realities of the childcare setting.
Heading text
12.6.2 Change tables
Heading number portion
12.6.2
Item id
1780076722871_204
Heading id
12.6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
be equipped with a safety strap to safely hold a person 75 kg in weight from accidentally rolling off;
What should we change it to?
Recommend deleting.
Why should we change it?
This contravenes public health guidance in Ontario (safety straps of this nature are next to impossible to keep clean; to mitigate germ transmission, they aren’t recommended), as well as poses a barrier to the child maintaining their dignity.
Heading text
12.6.2 Change tables
Heading number portion
12.6.2
Item id
1780076768567_683
Heading id
12.6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
have a concave top surface or a lip;
What should we change it to?
have a concave top surface or a lip, with a minimum height difference of x mm between the top of the lip and the lowest point of the changing surface;
Why should we change it?
A degree of concavity should be recommended here; the concave surface here, if designed right, will do most of the work of preventing someone from accidentally rolling off.
Heading text
12.6.2 Change tables
Heading number portion
12.6.2
Item id
1780076853292_844
Heading id
heading-78
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Privacy for both children and adults in a childcare centre is a priority. Childcare centres shall have at least one toileting assistance bathroom. Toileting assistance bathroom shall: a. comply with Clause 12.6.1; b. have the stationary position clear space required by Clause 12.6.1 that does not overlap with any other clear space requirements (e.g., turning diameter clear space, grab bar clearance, etc.); and c. not be located in direct view of the entrance, waiting areas, play areas, or other areas where children commonly gather to allow caregivers to provide assistance with minimal exposure during entry and exit. Note: Adults and children who are unable to activate the emergency call system should always be accompanied by another person.
What should we change it to?
Recommend to add a note: Note: The age and functional needs of children requiring toileting assistance should be taken into consideration when ensuring appropriate set up of bathrooms for toileting assistance; as such considerations around preservation of privacy and protecting the dignity of the child.
Why should we change it?
This clause is confusing, as it seems to imply a use case where adult caregivers (not childcare centre staff) will provide toileting assistance to their children, and that this will be done in a separate bathroom than the facilities that the child might use otherwise during their time at the childcare centre. (If this wasn’t the use case contemplated, it will be important to review the language for clarity.)
Heading text
12.6.3.1 Privacy considerations
Heading number portion
12.6.3.1
Item id
1780076902491_760
Heading id
12.7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Kitchen and Dining Area
What should we change it to?
Kitchen and Dining Areas for Staff and Children
Why should we change it?
Is the dining area contemplated in this clause for staff? Or children? Or both? A separate, common, dining area for all staff and children seems to be what was in mind when this clause was written, but, again, that use case does not necessarily reflect reality…
Heading text
12.7 Kitchen and Dining Area
Heading number portion
12.7
Item id
1780076959961_363
Heading id
12.7.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Dining areas shall: a. be designed to accommodate a specific and known number of children, teachers, and staff; b. provide non-overlapping stationary position clear space as per Clause 12.1.2 for the number of people to be accommodated as per item a) of this Clause; c. be served by a path of travel that complies with Clause 12.1.1; d. have adjustable tables that comply with Clause 12.4.9.1; e. provide at least one turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm permitted to overlap with the stationary positions; f. include a 30% minimum Michelson luminance (colour) contrast complying with clause 4.2 CSA/ASC B651:23 between key elements such as tables, walls, floors, door, etc.; g. have a transfer space of 900 mm x 1,500 mm where a transition from a wheeled mobility device to a solid chair is required; and h. have a sink that complies with clause 5.10.7 of CSA/ASC B652:23. Note 1: The flexibility of movable furniture, such as tables and chairs in the dining area, enhances the ability to create an accessible dining layout that accommodates varying occupancies and needs. Note 2: Consider a mix of chairs with and without armrests to accommodate different mobility needs. Note 3: Dining areas should be separate from high-risk kitchen zones to ensure child safety. This is best achieved in separate kitchen and dining area layouts. Note 4: Consider providing a separate quiet area or sensory-friendly seating option for children who require a low-stimulation environment.
What should we change it to?
Consider, at minimum, a note added to this clause that highlights that staff may eat with children in dining areas integrated into the children’s activity areas, but there is also the need to ensure that there is a dining area as part of the break room/staff workspace. Consider adding the sink requirement (12.7.3h) to the clauses describing requirements for classrooms, multi-purpose rooms and multi-functional rooms.
Why should we change it?
Given how this section is written, a few things were clear: First, a staff dining area was not contemplated (this should be integrated into 14.2, or given a separate subclause in 12.7.3). Second, this clause assumes a permanent dining area, which doesn’t match with common practice. In many childcare centres, the dining areas are repurposed from the classrooms/multi-functional rooms where activities go on – meals are just another activity. Indeed, in that context, would 12.7.3 not be better served being integrated into the language in 12.4? Third, clause 12.7.3h should also apply to classrooms, multi-functional rooms and multi-purpose rooms.
Heading text
12.7.3 Dining area
Heading number portion
12.7.3
Item id
1780077021143_519
Heading id
s12.9
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Locker rooms shall: a. have a total bench length (single or multiple benches) of 2,400 mm; b. have benches that comply with clause 6.4 of CSA/ASC B651:23, except for item d), where the top surface height from the floor is permitted to be as low as 305 mm where justified by the demographics of the childcare centre (see note below); and c. comply with clause 6.8 of CSA/ASC B651:23. Note: Clause 6.4 of CSA/ASC B651:23 requires that locker room benches be mounted with their top surface 480 mm to 520 mm from the floor. However, benches intended for children may be as low as 300 mm. Depending on the design and demographics of the childcare centre, the height of the benches will need to be mixed between those that comply with CSA/ASC B651:23 and those which are 305 mm above the floor. Where possible, particularly in smaller rooms, height-adjustable benches should be used to accommodate both adults and children.
What should we change it to?
Make this a “should” not a “shall”
Why should we change it?
Many childcare centres don’t have locker rooms at all for children, and don’t have space for locker rooms for staff.
Heading text
12.9 Locker rooms
Heading number portion
12.9
Item id
1780077110054_276
Heading id
14.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces Accessible staff workspaces shall: a. be served by a path of travel that complies with Clause 12.1.1; b. have a stationary clear space complying with Clause 12.1.2 for each workstation or equipment; c. have a turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm that does not overlap with the stationary clear space; and d. have desks or tables that comply with Clause 12.4.9.1. Note 1: The turning space not overlapping with the stationary space allows one person in a wheeled mobility device to be moving while another person remains stationary in the workspace. Note 2: When purchasing goods and services, accessibility specifications should be carefully considered. The operational requirements should consider accessibility for both the staff who operate the goods or services and the individuals who will benefit from them. Since accessibility needs vary on a case-by-case basis, specifications cannot be assumed. It is essential to evaluate the specific needs of the individuals who will operate and benefit from the goods or services, identifying requirements that are both accessible and practical for them. Selecting accessible technologies that accommodate multiple accessibility needs is often the most effective approach. 14.2 Break rooms and rest areas Break rooms and rest areas shall: a. be served by a path of travel that complies with Clause 12.1.1; b. where provided, have seating that complies with clause 6.7.2 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. have stationary clear space in accordance with Clause 12.1.2 for a known number of staff but not less than two people; and d. have a turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm that does not overlap with at least one of the provided stationary clear spaces.
What should we change it to?
Recommend combining these two clauses into a single clause
Why should we change it?
In many childcare centres, from a practical standpoint, these are the same spaces. Consider merging into a single clause, and adding a note indicating that, while they could be separate spaces, they do not have to be.
Heading text
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces
Heading number portion
14.1
Item id
1780077169285_531
Heading id
14.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces Accessible staff workspaces shall: a. be served by a path of travel that complies with Clause 12.1.1; b. have a stationary clear space complying with Clause 12.1.2 for each workstation or equipment; c. have a turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm that does not overlap with the stationary clear space; and d. have desks or tables that comply with Clause 12.4.9.1. Note 1: The turning space not overlapping with the stationary space allows one person in a wheeled mobility device to be moving while another person remains stationary in the workspace. Note 2: When purchasing goods and services, accessibility specifications should be carefully considered. The operational requirements should consider accessibility for both the staff who operate the goods or services and the individuals who will benefit from them. Since accessibility needs vary on a case-by-case basis, specifications cannot be assumed. It is essential to evaluate the specific needs of the individuals who will operate and benefit from the goods or services, identifying requirements that are both accessible and practical for them. Selecting accessible technologies that accommodate multiple accessibility needs is often the most effective approach.
What should we change it to?
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces or Offices Accessible staff workspaces or offices shall: a. be served by a path of travel that complies with Clause 12.1.1; b. have a stationary clear space complying with Clause 12.1.2 for each workstation or equipment; c. have a turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm that does not overlap with the stationary clear space; and d. have desks or tables that comply with Clause 12.4.9.1. Note 1: The turning space not overlapping with the stationary space allows one person in a wheeled mobility device to be moving while another person remains stationary in the workspace. Note 2: When purchasing goods and services, accessibility specifications should be carefully considered. The operational requirements should consider accessibility for both the staff who operate the goods or services and the individuals who will benefit from them. Since accessibility needs vary on a case-by-case basis, specifications cannot be assumed. It is essential to evaluate the specific needs of the individuals who will operate and benefit from the goods or services, identifying requirements that are both accessible and practical for them. Selecting accessible technologies that accommodate multiple accessibility needs is often the most effective approach.
Why should we change it?
There is a provincial requirement in Ontario for staff to have an office at a childcare centre. Suggest using similar language so that the standard is easier to implement.
Heading text
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces
Heading number portion
14.1
Item id
1780077217719_926
Heading id
s14.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
14.2 Break rooms and rest areas Break rooms and rest areas shall: a. be served by a path of travel that complies with Clause 12.1.1; b. where provided, have seating that complies with clause 6.7.2 of CSA/ASC B651:23; c. have stationary clear space in accordance with Clause 12.1.2 for a known number of staff but not less than two people; and d. have a turning diameter clear space of 2,100 mm that does not overlap with at least one of the provided stationary clear spaces.
What should we change it to?
Include a provision for service dog rest area in this space as well.
Why should we change it?
A space is required for service dogs on site, whose handlers are staff, to rest when they are not working, or when it is not practical or permitted for them to be with their handlers when working with children.
Heading text
14.2 Break rooms and rest areas
Heading number portion
14.2
Item id
1780077285155_609
Heading id
15.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
e) provide ambient light levels at least 200 lx in the dining area;
What should we change it to?
e) provide ambient light levels at least 200 lx in spaces that are used as dining areas;
Why should we change it?
This requirement assumes a separate dining area, and there may not be.
Heading text
15.2 Lighting (illumination) design
Heading number portion
15.2
Item id
1780077329678_669
Heading id
15.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Note 3: Installing hearing loop, FM, or Bluetooth-compatible systems in reception areas, meeting rooms, and learning spaces are encouraged to enhance accessibility.
What should we change it to?
Note 3: Installing hearing loop, FM, or Bluetooth-compatible systems in reception areas, meeting rooms, and children’s activity spaces are encouraged to enhance accessibility.
Why should we change it?
The standard uses inconsistent terminology to refer to children’s activity spaces – “learning spaces” is used here, while this seems to be a classroom space as established in 12.4. “Children’s activity soaces” seems to be a broader term that could be used as an umbrella throughout the standard.
Heading text
15.3 Acoustic design
Heading number portion
15.3
Item id
1780077368989_782
Heading id
s18.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Childcare centres shall have a maintenance plan in place to ensure that all accessibility features and safety are kept fully operational. Maintenance plans include but are not limited to: a. quarterly feature testing; b. quarterly emergency egress drills; c. instant reporting system for damage or malfunctioning equipment; d. an established service network for fast repair of critical equipment; and e. annual accessibility audit. Note: Responsibility for accessibility upkeep should be assigned to a designated accessibility coordinator.
What should we change it to?
Consider adding a requirement about timely snow removal during winter for exterior paths of travel, specifically those enumerated in Clauses 10 and 16.
Why should we change it?
There is nothing in this standard about exterior paths of travel (e.g., those referenced in Clauses 10 and 16) needing to be kept clear during all seasons. Particularly with winter, snow removal is both a safety and accessibility consideration.
Heading text
18.3 Regular upkeep
Heading number portion
18.3
Item id
1780077452638_951
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
n/a
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
There is no language or requirement in this standard for children’s rest areas. Many childcare centres repurpose a classroom into a communal rest area at naptime, and don’t have a dedicated rest area. Consider including a set of requirements to define how rest areas are designed and set up.
Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1780077483732_373
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
n/a
What should we change it to?
Minimum interior design needs for a childcare centre: A classroom or multifunctional room An accessible children’s bathroom A children's dining area, which might be integrated into the multi-functional room A children’s rest area, which might be integrated into the multi-functional room A staff office or workspace A staff break room or rest area An accessible adult washroom An exterior play area All other design elements described in this standard are good to have, but not essential. Include references to all appropriate clauses.
Why should we change it?
The standard would benefit greatly from a section that highlights the minimum components of a childcare centre.
Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1780077517522_610
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
n/a
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
The comments provided in this submission are jointly submitted by IDEA-STEM Consulting Inc and Unity Childcare Centres, based in Kingston, ON. They combine lived, living and professional experiences across several relevant and intersecting domains: 1. Standards development; 2. Owning and operating a business that runs multiple childcare centres in the city of Kingston (including one that is specifically designed and marketed at inclusive to children with disabilities, which also employs staff with disabilities); 3. Parent of a neurodivergent child; 4. Parent with a disability.
Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Submission ID
65444
Submitted by
sweiner
Submitted on
Fri, 05/29/2026 - 13:59
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65457's submission

CAN-ASC-4.1 Accessible Procurement
Feedback items
Item id
1779994451901_333
Heading id
s10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
To the Accessible Procurement Resource Centre (APRC) Suggested feedback re Draft Standard for Accessible Procurement Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft standard for accessible procurement. At the Document Imaging Solutions Centre (DISC) of PSPC, we have had the pleasure of working with our procurement colleagues in the development of the National Master Standing Offer (NMSO) for digitization services currently available to the federal government and to other public sector organizations in Canada under the Canadian Collaborative Procurement Initiative (CCPI). We are very pleased that our expertise when combined with that of Procurement Branch helps other organizations achieve their digitization and data enrichment objectives in a cost-effective and technically correct manner, meeting all required Government of Canada standards. Related to accessibility, DISC will complete an Accessibility Digitization project under the Innovative Solutions Canada (ISC) program by October 2027 that will be invaluable in meeting the objectives set out in the standard for Accessible Procurement and the Government of Canada obligations under the Accessible Canada Act 2019. The area of focus is the Information Management section. The project is developing a software solution with the support of the Innovative Research Solutions Division-Challenges (SI). The software solution will meet the change statement posted on the ISC website; https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovative-solutions-canada/en/turning-pixels-data-imaging-accessibility which seeks to fully automate the remediation of static file formats like PDF into dynamic file formats like HTML5 and ePub3 so that accessibility tools like JAWS (Job Access With Speech) which is an example of a screen reader that converts on-screen text, menus, and controls into synthesized speech or Braille. It empowers individuals who are blind or have low vision to navigate computers, browse websites, and operate applications independently. The software solution has cleared Phase 1 and we are at milestone 4 of 12 in Phase 2 of the prototype development using a multi-model AI architecture to remediate high volume of information management assets with high quality and low cost. We would like to suggest that the standard recognize the importance of remediation of static information management assets and partner with DISC for solutions when vendors submit materials in a static file format and/or public servant employees require materials in accessible formats to be able to do their job within Procurement Branch.
What should we change it to?
x
Why should we change it?
x
Heading text
11. Procurement information, websites, and applications
Heading number portion
11.
Submission ID
65457
Submitted by
bruce.covington@pwgsc.gc.ca
Submitted on
Thu, 05/28/2026 - 14:54
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65536's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1781020192055_631
Heading id
s6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?

add section

What should we change it to?

add section

Why should we change it?

Technology Integration: The document mentions assistive technologies but could provide more specific guidance on current and emerging technologies that support accessibility in childcare settings.

Heading text
7. Scope
Heading number portion
7.
Item id
1781020290365_616
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?

n/a

What should we change it to?

Introduction references intersectionality and Indigenous Peoples but childcare-specific clauses do not.

Why should we change it?

Add explicit mention of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis childcare contexts in relevant sections (e.g., activity rooms, outdoor play, family areas).

Helps reflect systemic barriers and equity needs specific to Indigenous childcare environments.

Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1781020391030_153
Heading id
s16.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Add

What should we change it to?

Add references to CAN-ASC 2.1 “Outdoor Spaces”? I understand this is currently in draft, but if not added at rollout, references to relevant sections should be included as an amendment.

Why should we change it?

Harmonization with other standards

Heading text
16.1 Outdoor play equipment
Heading number portion
16.1
Item id
1781020663899_879
Heading id
s18.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

whole clause

What should we change it to?

Maintenance Clarity: this section requires "quarterly" testing and drills but doesn't specify what constitutes adequate testing protocols or who should conduct them.

Why should we change it?

Clarity

Heading text
18.3 Regular upkeep
Heading number portion
18.3
Submission ID
65536
Submitted by
sweiner
Submitted on
Tue, 06/09/2026 - 11:58
Consent to contact
Yes

Info Source: Sources of federal government and employee information

Info Source: Sources of federal government and employee information 2025 to 2026 General information Alternate formats Large print, print, braille, MP3 (audio), e-text, sign language and Digital Accessible Information System ( DAISY ) formats are …

Information and communication technologies

Information and communication technologies On this page Standards CAN/ASC - EN 301 549:2024 - Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services (EN 301 549:2021, IDT) CAN-ASC-6.2 Accessible and Equitable Artificial Intelligence Systems Technical …

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) What this priority area is about Information and communication technologies (ICT) are the digital tools and systems people use daily. This includes: websites mobile apps software virtual meetings online …

Informing Standards for Acoustics and the Built Environment

This study will look at the impact of the acoustic environment on people with disabilities. It will explore ways to reduce noise. It will also examine assistive listening technologies. The goal is to contribute to the removal and prevention of acoustics barriers.

Interdisciplinary Study of Evacuating Persons with Disabilities from an Urban Centre

This study will gather information about the needs of people with disabilities during an evacuation. This includes information on the support they need to transition back to their communities.

Interim activity reports

These reports help us understand how your project is progressing in each period. You must report on:

  • what project activities you’ve completed
  • if you are meeting your project’s timeline
  • how you’re meeting your project’s goals and objectives

Refer to Schedule A of your funding agreement to provide information on these elements. The reports give you a chance to highlight any issues that may affect the project’s success. They also allow you to explain any differences between planned and actual activities.

When to submit the forms

  •  At specific times during your project.
    • Your funding agreement indicate the dates your interim activity reports are due.
    • We will also send you email reminders before each report is due.

Late submissions may affect your funding or project status. If you anticipate a delay, contact us as soon as possible at Recherche.NAC-Research.ASC@asc-nac.gc.ca.

How to complete the form

  • Fill in your project and organization information, and the period you are reporting on
  • Answer all the questions in the form
  • Have the form signed by an authorized signatory
Important

In the activity reports, you must also report on specific data. See the “Reporting on data” section to understand why you need to collect this information.

Download the form

Choose the version that works best for you. The form with “simplified” in the name has been formatted to work better with screen readers.

If the document does not open automatically, open it from your Downloads folder.

Interim activity reports [Word version] (106.78 KB)
Interim activity report, simplified [Word version] (110.06 KB)

International travel approval

If your project includes international travel and you want to use Accessibility Standards Canada’s funding to pay for it (fully or partially), you must get our approval before the travel takes place. This is to ensure that:

  • the costs are eligible
  • the travel is necessary for the project
  • the knowledge or data you are seeking could not be obtained in Canada

When to submit the form

  • At least 6 weeks before the date of travel

How to complete the form

  • Fill in your project and organization information
  • Provide travel details
    • Explain the purpose of the travel and how it is directly related to project activities
    • Explain why the expertise, data or work you are seeking could not be obtained in Canada
    • Indicate the estimated cost of travel, including transportation, accommodations and other costs
  • Have the form signed by an authorized signatory

Download the form

If the document does not open automatically, open it from your Downloads folder.

International travel approval [Word version] (80.57 KB)

Pagination

  • First page first
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 63
  • Page 64
  • Current page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Next page Next
  • Last page last
Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply (required)

Share widget

Date modified:
2026-06-10

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Accessibility Standards Canada

  • Login
  • Create an account

About government

Government of Canada

  • All contacts
  • Departments and agencies
  • About government

Themes and topics

  • Jobs
  • Immigration and citizenship
  • Travel and tourism
  • Business
  • Benefits
  • Health
  • Taxes
  • Environment and natural resources
  • National security and defence
  • Culture, history and sport
  • Policing, justice and emergencies
  • Transport and infrastructure
  • Canada and the world
  • Money and finances
  • Science and innovation
  • Indigenous Peoples
  • Veterans and military
  • Youth
  • Manage life events

Brand

  • Social Media
  • Mobile Applications
  • About Canada.ca
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Site map
Top of Page
Symbol of the Government of Canada