• Skip to main content
  • Skip to "About government"

Language switcher

  • Françaisfr
Government of Canada / Government of Canada

Search Accessbility Standards Canada


Use the Left and Right arrow keys to navigate between the top level menu items. Press the ENTER key or double tap the SPACEBAR to select a menu item. To navigate through a sub menu, Press the SPACEBAR or the Down arrow key. Use the Up and Down arrow keys to navigate through submenu items. Press the Enter or SPACEBAR to select a submenu item. Press the ESCAPE key to close the submenu and return to the top level.

Main navigation

  • Home
    • About us
    • Accessibility Plan 2025
    • Get involved
    • Reports and publications
    • Transparency
    • Consultations
    • Organizational structure
  • Standards and technical guides
    • Standards and technical guides database
    • Standards under public review
    • Technical committees
    • Work program
  • Research and funding
    • Funded research project database
    • Advancing Accessibility Standards Research
  • Centre of Expertise
  • Contact us
  • Login

Mobile Menu

  • Home
    • About us
    • Accessibility Plan 2025
    • Get involved
    • Reports and publications
    • Transparency
    • Consultations
    • Organizational structure
  • Standards and technical guides
    • Standards and technical guides database
    • Standards under public review
    • Technical committees
    • Work program
  • Research and funding
    • Funded research project database
    • Advancing Accessibility Standards Research
  • Centre of Expertise
  • Contact us
  • Login

You are here

  1. Canada.ca
  2. Accessibility Standards Canada
  3. Search results

Search results


Displaying 621 - 630 of 808

Individual 65244's submission

CAN-ASC-4.1 Accessible Procurement
Feedback items
Item id
1777289468948_478
Heading id
10.1.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
a.iii. include technical evaluation criteria to assess the bidder's capacity to deliver against accessibility specifications. This is a slippery slope.
What should we change it to?
a.iii. ensure that the bidders commit to remediating their proposed solution seeking to reach full conformance to the EN 301 549.
Why should we change it?
You want the bidder to commit to remediating their product or service to conform to the CAN/ASC standard (EN 301 549), but you don't want to evaluate any Accessibility Conformance Report they submit as the ACRs can be misleading unless all the proposed solutions from all vendors, were assessed and documented by the same accessibility conformance tester.
Heading text
10.1.2 Roles and responsibilities
Heading number portion
10.1.2
Item id
1777289598163_15
Heading id
11.4.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Missing any comment on the equipment that is in the room.
What should we change it to?
ensuring that the ICT equipment (video equipment, microphones, controls to operate the equipment, etc) are at an accessible location
Why should we change it?
Some ICT equipment is simply not accessible either by their remotes or where the switches are placed.
Heading text
11.4.4.5 Meeting rooms
Heading number portion
11.4.4.5
Item id
1777289867178_761
Heading id
12.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
v. where no clear suitable solution can be found, follow the mandatory justification for excluding accessibility set out in Clause 10.1.4.
What should we change it to?
v. use the mandatory justification for excluding accessibility set out in Clause 10.1.4 with extreme caution. Always try to work towards conformance to the En 301 549
Why should we change it?
Just because there isn't a solution that is conformant to the EN 301 549, or industry doesn't currently build to it, there is no reason to not start asking for them to do so over time. If we don't push the needle, industry won't develop.
Heading text
12.1 Defining requirements
Heading number portion
12.1
Item id
1777289975577_216
Heading id
12.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Duty to accommodate - the purchase of tech to support an individuals' needs should explicitly say the Standard does not apply.
What should we change it to?
d. the purchase of what works for the individual is paramount and consideration of whether the En 301 549 applies, is not applicable.
Why should we change it?
Duty to accommodate - the purchase of tech to support an individuals' needs should explicitly say the Standard does not apply.
Heading text
12.1.1 Exception - Individual accommodation procurement
Heading number portion
12.1.1
Item id
1777290025481_123
Heading id
12.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Using the word "testing" on its own.
What should we change it to?
accessibility conformance testing.
Why should we change it?
People don't understand what testing means. They need to understand they need to test against the standard, not against some made up list of things.
Heading text
12.2 Identifying requirements for testing
Heading number portion
12.2
Submission ID
65244
Submitted by
leah.glick-stal@ssc-spc.gc.ca
Submitted on
Mon, 04/27/2026 - 07:41
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65260's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1777575024197_129
Heading id
12.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Paths of travel that do not form part of the emergency path of travel shall comply with clause 5 of CSA/ASC B651:23 and shall include tactile wayfinding supports, such as tactile walking surface indicators.
What should we change it to?
Paths of travel that do not form part of the emergency path of travel shall comply with clause 5 of CSA/ASC B651:23 and shall include multi-sensory wayfinding supports, including tactile walking surface indicators, tactile and high contrast stair and curb edges, auditory cues, and, where appropriate, digital navigation supports (e.g., accessible navigation technologies).
Why should we change it?
Tactile wayfinding alone does not provide sufficient navigation support for all individuals who are blind or low vision. Multi-sensory wayfinding systems improve orientation, independence, and safety by offering redundant and complementary navigation cues. Incorporating auditory and digital supports aligns with best practices and reflects real-world navigation needs.
Heading text
12.1.1 Paths of travel
Heading number portion
12.1.1
Item id
1777575145784_451
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Signage — Information provided in the form of visual and tactile communication that incorporates one or more of the following elements: a) alphanumeric characters; b) pictograms; c) illustrations (plans, etc.); or d) braille.
What should we change it to?
Signage — Information provided in the form of visual and tactile communication that incorporates one or more of the following elements: a) alphanumeric characters; b) pictograms; c) illustrations (plans, etc.); or d) braille; e) and shall include both tactile and braille elements as mandatory components for permanent signage, with large print and high contrast, consistent placement, height, and formatting requirements.
Why should we change it?
While braille and tactile signage are referenced, they are not required. Without mandatory requirements, implementation may be inconsistent or omitted entirely. Ensuring tactile and braille signage is required supports independent navigation and aligns with accessibility best practices for people who are blind or partially sighted.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1777575238632_369
Heading id
s11.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Accessible entry systems including but not limited to keypads and intercoms shall comply with clause 5.7.4.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23.
What should we change it to?
Accessible entry systems including but not limited to keypads and intercoms shall comply with clause 5.7.4.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23 and shall provide non-visual access, including audible feedback, speech output, and tactile controls, ensuring full operability by individuals who are blind or partially sighted.
Why should we change it?
Many entry systems rely on visual interfaces, which creates barriers for individuals who are blind or low vision. Requiring audible and tactile functionality ensures independent and equitable access to childcare facilities for parents, staff, and visitors with vision loss.
Heading text
11.4.1 Accessible entry systems
Heading number portion
11.4.1
Item id
1777575485544_538
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Clear signage, simple visuals, universally recognizable symbols as recommended in CSA/ASC B651:23 - Accessible Design for the Built Environment and predictable layouts aid navigation for individuals with visual or cognitive disabilities.
What should we change it to?
Clear, large print and high-contrast signage, simple visuals, universally recognizable symbols as recommended in CSA/ASC B651:23 - Accessible Design for the Built Environment, as well as tactile, auditory, and digital navigation supports, and predictable layouts aid navigation for individuals with visual or cognitive disabilities.
Why should we change it?
The current language emphasizes visual navigation, which does not fully address the needs of individuals who are blind. Including tactile, auditory, and digital navigation supports ensures a more inclusive, multi-sensory approach to wayfinding and aligns with best practices for accessibility.
Heading text
6.2 Overview of accessible design in childcare centres
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1777575556764_653
Heading id
12.2.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Touchscreen only controls should not be used, and elevator buttons must meet CSA B44.1:25/ASME A17.5-2025 appendix E requirements for tactile features including raised characters and Braille.
What should we change it to?
Touchscreen only controls shall not be used, and elevator buttons must meet CSA B44.1:25/ASME A17.5-2025 appendix E requirements for tactile features including raised characters and Braille, and shall also include audible floor announcements and audible control feedback.
Why should we change it?
While tactile buttons are essential, audible feedback is equally critical for independent use by individuals who are blind or partially sighted. Audible announcements improve orientation and ensure users can confirm their location and navigation within the building.
Heading text
12.2.3 Elevators
Heading number portion
12.2.3
Submission ID
65260
Submitted by
rosalyn.commisso@cnib.ca
Submitted on
Thu, 04/30/2026 - 14:56
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65284's submission

CAN-ASC-4.1 Accessible Procurement
Feedback items
Item id
1777928710348_428
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The references to Bid, Bidder and Binding Agreeement are not consistent with what PSPC and OGDs have adopted per CMI plain language.
What should we change it to?
Bidders are now all "offerors". Bids are Offers Agreements are Standing Offers or Contracts. Tenders are now all solicitations
Why should we change it?
to align with CMI.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1777928997053_851
Heading id
10.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The aspiration is good but in application its not realistic. we don't have endless budgets to accommodate the needs of all potential suppliers.
What should we change it to?
Frame as aspirational
Why should we change it?
to be realistic and consider time and cost.
Heading text
10.1 Policies and procedures
Heading number portion
10.1
Item id
1777929083704_400
Heading id
10.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
c. seems to contradict a and b.
What should we change it to?
frame as aspirational.
Why should we change it?
to be realistic.
Heading text
10.1.1 Incorporating accessibility
Heading number portion
10.1.1
Item id
1777929775019_579
Heading id
13.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
This approach to costing would make the evaluation unfair un not transparent. what would stop bidders from hiding cost in the accessibility/accomodation costs.
What should we change it to?
remove this entirely
Why should we change it?
It conflicts with basic public procurement principles.
Heading text
13.1.1 Accessibility cost treatment in bidding
Heading number portion
13.1.1
Submission ID
65284
Submitted by
robert.turek@pc.gc.ca
Submitted on
Mon, 05/04/2026 - 17:25
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65335's submission

CAN-ASC-4.1 Accessible Procurement
Feedback items
Item id
1778589359389_968
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Directive on Management of Procurement now uses the term 'Business Owners' instead of clients - recommend aligning the language with the Directive.
What should we change it to?
Business Owners
Why should we change it?
Keep consistent language
Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Submission ID
65335
Submitted by
kirsten.sage@pc.gc.ca
Submitted on
Thu, 05/14/2026 - 12:23
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65339's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1778610276561_697
Heading id
15.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note 2: Where feasible, lighting systems should comply with circadian-friendly design, providing lighting that reflects the natural variations of daylight.
What should we change it to?
Committee must decide if this is a "should" or a "shall".
Why should we change it?
This was originally written as a requirement ("shall") but had to be changed to a "should" because requirements cannot be included in notes.
Heading text
15.2 Lighting (illumination) design
Heading number portion
15.2
Item id
1778610485527_500
Heading id
s18.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note: Storage areas containing medical or chemical substances that may pose a risk to children should be secured and inaccessible to children at all times. Access to these areas should be restricted to authorized personnel who are trained in the identification, handling, and storage of such substances.
What should we change it to?
Committee to decide if this is a "should" or a "shall".
Why should we change it?
Given the risk involved to children’s health should this not be a “shall” requirement?
Heading text
18.1 Cleaning facilities
Heading number portion
18.1
Item id
1778611020198_859
Heading id
s7.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Whole section
What should we change it to?
Remove this section or consider rewriting.
Why should we change it?
Can this be deleted if there aren’t any ranges? However, omitting it entirely might make readers think it was overlooked.
Heading text
7.5 Ranges
Heading number portion
7.5
Item id
1778612619587_552
Heading id
s7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Canadian General Standards Board CAN/CGSB 12.5-M86 - Mirrors, Silvered;
What should we change it to?
Possibly remove
Why should we change it?
SCC’s note is that this standard is withdrawn.
Heading text
8. References
Heading number portion
8.
Item id
1778612860367_83
Heading id
12.2.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note 2: Touchscreen only controls should not be used, and elevator buttons must meet CSA B44.1:25/ASME A17.5-2025 appendix E requirements for tactile features including raised characters and Braille.
What should we change it to?
Consider changing the word "must" to something like "should".
Why should we change it?
Need to adjust as “must” implies requirement which we can’t have in notes.
Heading text
12.2.3 Elevators
Heading number portion
12.2.3
Item id
1778613036455_754
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
e) provide a “safety bed and chair” within the space; and
What should we change it to?
Consider removing the quotation marks.
Why should we change it?
Is this meant to be in quotations? If so, why? If not, they should be removed.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1778613215635_828
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The following requirements support a flexible design for multi-purpose rooms:
What should we change it to?
"Shall/should/may" phrase needs to be added.
Why should we change it?
We need a shall/should or may statement for flow and because this is a major provision.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Submission ID
65339
Submitted by
sweiner
Submitted on
Tue, 05/12/2026 - 15:18
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65344's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1778699232290_807
Heading id
s7.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The standard excludes home-based childcare centres and refers them to CSA/ASC B652:23 Accessible Dwellings. While this exclusion is understood, additional guidance would be helpful for home-based childcare providers, families, and system planners. Home-based childcare remains an important part of the childcare landscape, including for smaller, rural, remote, and Métis communities. The standard should consider adding an informative note or companion guidance that identifies which accessibility principles may still be relevant to home-based childcare settings, particularly regarding safe entry, toileting, emergency egress, sensory regulation, communication supports, and accessible family interaction.
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
7.2 Exclusions
Heading number portion
7.2
Item id
1778699305563_339
Heading id
s7.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The standard should provide clearer guidance for childcare centres operating in leased, shared, school-based, municipal, or community-owned buildings where operators do not control all common areas, entrances, parking, washrooms, elevators, or exterior paths of travel. The standard acknowledges that retrofitting common areas beyond the childcare centre itself may not always be possible, but additional guidance is needed on how centres should document barriers, work with landlords or facility owners, prioritize improvements, and communicate partial accessibility to families. This would make the standard more usable for operators who support accessibility but do not have full capital authority over the building. It would be beneficial to explain the scope of the Federal Government compared to provincial, territorial and First Nations governments. For Métis childcares, the accessibility standards are outside the provincial government’s purview, which is responsible for licensing childcares. Will the Federal government work with the Province of Ontario to include these standards in their licensing requirements, or as an additional designation? For childcare centres that wish to be deemed accessible, will there be a certifying group, and will an information bulletin be sent to childcare centres to schedule an assessment?
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
7.3 Applications
Heading number portion
7.3
Item id
1778699400671_37
Heading id
s7.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
It is recommended that accessible design should be flexible enough to support local/provincial, territorial, and distinctions-based pedagogical approaches (i.e., under the sections on toys, sensory materials, outdoor play, and pedagogical expert judgment).
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
7.6 Other relevant restrictions or considerations
Heading number portion
7.6
Item id
1778699443775_952
Heading id
s7.7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The terminology is clear and well defined. However, those standards that “shall” be required will be difficult to enforce if left to the provinces that license childcare facilities. How will these standards be enforced?
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
7.7 Terminology
Heading number portion
7.7
Item id
1778699508755_870
Heading id
s10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The branch supports accessible signage for wayfinding, emergency response, and family access. However, the standard may benefit from additional guidance recognizing that childcare centres also manage child safety and security risks. Suggested clarification on centre signage for authorized users, visitors, emergency responders, and service providers, while allowing centres where public-facing identification creates a documented safety concern.
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
11. Building entrances and exits
Heading number portion
11.
Item id
1778699551536_878
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Design of childcare activity rooms: Clause 12.4 requires space for at least one therapy room and one quiet room. The flexibility allowing these spaces to be integrated into multi-purpose or multi-functional rooms is helpful. However, the term “therapy room” may unintentionally imply that childcare centres are expected to provide clinical therapy services. The standard should clarify that this requirement is about providing an accessible, private, flexible support space that can accommodate consultation, developmental support, family meetings, resource consultant visits, inclusion planning, or therapeutic services where applicable. Suggested wording could include “therapy, consultation, or inclusion-support space.”
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1778699630903_335
Heading id
heading-73
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note 1: The inclusion of the pedagogical expert in selecting the toys and evaluating auditory stimuli (i.e., music) provides space for professional judgement when integrating culturally relevant materials into the learning space.
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
12.5.2.2 Auditory experiences
Heading number portion
12.5.2.2
Item id
1778699679919_634
Heading id
s16.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Notes 1 & 2: The recommendation to provide a rich range of materials and settings, including contact with the living natural world, as well as various play options that support gross and fine motor skills, mobility, and cognitive development, supports the inclusion of Métis pedagogy in the learning space.
What should we change it to?
n/a
Why should we change it?
n/a
Heading text
16.1 Outdoor play equipment
Heading number portion
16.1
Submission ID
65344
Submitted by
mnoeducation@metisnation.org
Submitted on
Wed, 05/13/2026 - 15:16
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65345's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1778702523953_296
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
There is significant risk that this standard be used as a way to avoid providing inclusive care (ie. We do no have A, B, C…)
What should we change it to?
No comment
Why should we change it?
No comment
Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778702582423_456
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
It would seem valuable and useful to connect with child care educators and providers as some of these items don't seem to consider the practical realities of a child care settings (ie. Programming, real life use, financial feasibility, existing physical spaces both in size and multipurposeful use.
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778702701879_474
Heading id
s6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Second paragraph, "Prioritizing accessibility removes…"
What should we change it to?
Prioritizing accessibility mitigates...play and learn together with appropriate support.
Why should we change it?
Implies complete removal of barriers.
Heading text
6.1 Importance of accessibility in childcare centres
Heading number portion
6.1
Item id
1778702768615_363
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
This standard seems to focus more on supporting accessibility to staff vs. participating children. Also, more consideration to cognitive disabilities would be useful.
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
6.2 Overview of accessible design in childcare centres
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1778702807974_189
Heading id
s7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
"…that are either mandated.." who is mandated?
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
7.1 Inclusions
Heading number portion
7.1
Item id
1778702874640_383
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Definition of universal washrooms
What should we change it to?
Child size change table
Why should we change it?
Unlikely use of adult size in a child care setting.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778702952593_469
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Can therapy room and quiet room not be the same?
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1778703006558_130
Heading id
12.4.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Multiuse space would be a better way to achieve this as 'pull out therapy' is philosophical.
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
12.4.2 Therapy rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.2
Item id
1778703058085_897
Heading id
12.4.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add: Visual connectivity to other areas
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
Staff/Child safety best practice in abuse prevention.
Heading text
12.4.2 Therapy rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.2
Item id
1778703156845_464
Heading id
12.4.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
This seems too specific - can be integrated activity with regular classroom or additional rooms. It seems unrealistic to expect child care centres to invest in a music room with distinguishable acoustic properties and storage solutions.
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
12.4.3 Music rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.3
Item id
1778703223429_769
Heading id
12.4.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Additional sensory room suggestions
What should we change it to?
Consider CSA/ASC B651.2:23
Why should we change it?
This lacks many features of sensory friendly rooms
Heading text
12.4.4 Sensory rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.4
Item id
1778703278165_738
Heading id
12.4.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Additional sensory room suggestions
What should we change it to?
Add bullets h-m from page 50
Why should we change it?
This lacks many features of sensory friendly rooms.
Heading text
12.4.4 Sensory rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.4
Item id
1778703339357_420
Heading id
12.4.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Add: Visual connectivity to other areas
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
Staff/Child safety best practice in abuse prevention.
Heading text
12.4.4 Sensory rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.4
Item id
1778703420428_516
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
b) be designed to accommodate a maximum of two people
What should we change it to?
Change maximum to more than two or remove max all together.
Why should we change it?
How this space is used is critical, designing it this way creates high likelihood of misuse, why can there only be two people in the room at a time? Think about safety and best practice in abuse prevention.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1778703481757_75
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
e) provide a 'safety bed and chair' within the space
What should we change it to?
Remove.
Why should we change it?
Think about safety and best practice in abuse prevention. Concerning including this in a standard without rationale, reason or direction of use.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1778703522468_265
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Add: Visual connectivity to other areas
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
Staff/Child safety best practice in abuse prevention.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1778703580230_49
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
bullets e, f, g
What should we change it to?
Lower the space requirements
Why should we change it?
This is a significant space requirement not currently required/accommodated.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1778703637485_825
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Missing additional auditory sensory option
What should we change it to?
Add bullet B from 12.5.2.2 in Note 1
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1778703690420_296
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Remove or edit Note 3
What should we change it to?
Lessen the requirement.
Why should we change it?
The cost of some of these in relation to likelihood of use is prohibitive.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1778703743275_232
Heading id
12.4.7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Missing additional auditory sensory option
What should we change it to?
Add bullet B from 12.5.2.2 in Note 1
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
12.4.7 Multi-functional rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.7
Item id
1778703808419_933
Heading id
12.5.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Define 'rest area' in bullets d and e
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
Unclear what this means.
Heading text
12.5.1 General
Heading number portion
12.5.1
Item id
1778703846547_547
Heading id
heading-70
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Bullet c) methods outlined in ASTM F1292, is this different than CSA Standards?
What should we change it to?
No comment.
Why should we change it?
No comment.
Heading text
12.5.1.1 Safety surfacing
Heading number portion
12.5.1.1
Item id
1778703889362_641
Heading id
12.5.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
c) be installed in such a manner as to be accessible to children in wheeled mobility devices
What should we change it to?
Remove
Why should we change it?
Need to consider practicalities - does this exist? Ie. Water or sand tables
Heading text
12.5.2 Sensory zones
Heading number portion
12.5.2
Item id
1778703989522_242
Heading id
12.5.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
d) have any materials which can be removed or thrown, be fixed to reduce the risk of ingestion or destruction.
What should we change it to?
Remove.
Why should we change it?
Does this mean all toys need to be fixed? This is not practical or realistic given a child care setting.
Heading text
12.5.2 Sensory zones
Heading number portion
12.5.2
Item id
1778704036490_300
Heading id
12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
aii) comply with clause 6.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23 for universal washrooms
What should we change it to?
Remove/adjust
Why should we change it?
Clause 6.3 of CSA/ASC B651:23 requires an adult size change table - use is unrealistic for a child care setting.
Heading text
12.6.1 Accessible bathrooms
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1778704072235_803
Heading id
12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
bv) have sharps disposal containers installed at a maximum height of 1100 mm from the finished floor, where provided.
What should we change it to?
Suggest in adult washrooms only
Why should we change it?
No comment
Heading text
12.6.1 Accessible bathrooms
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1778704110411_489
Heading id
12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note 1: For adult-assisted toileting spaces, adjustable-height toilets should be provided where feasible, to accommodate diverse needs, including mixed-age users and those requiring assistance.
What should we change it to?
Remove adjustable height toilets
Why should we change it?
We have not encountered these, again, consider functional practicality and cost.
Heading text
12.6.1 Accessible bathrooms
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1778706120843_778
Heading id
12.6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
f) have an adjustable table with the option to be lowered to 300mm in height from the floor
What should we change it to?
Do not require the need for adjustable change table
Why should we change it?
Must consider the likelihood of an an adult in a wheelchair needing to change infant/toddler diapers.
Heading text
12.6.2 Change tables
Heading number portion
12.6.2
Item id
1778706189538_150
Heading id
12.6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
k) have a storage system that complies with Clause 12.4.6 g) within reach of seated position in front of change table
What should we change it to?
Do not require the need for adjustable change table or storage system.
Why should we change it?
Must consider the likelihood of an adult in a wheelchair needing to change infant/toddler diapers.
Heading text
12.6.2 Change tables
Heading number portion
12.6.2
Item id
1778706216531_461
Heading id
12.6.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Child abuse prevention best practices need to be considered
What should we change it to?
No comment
Why should we change it?
No comment
Heading text
12.6.3 Support for assistance in toileting
Heading number portion
12.6.3
Item id
1778706263604_668
Heading id
12.7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
f) include outlets and switches on the front face of counters as shown in figure…
What should we change it to?
Add safety measures for children or remove.
Why should we change it?
Balance of access for staff in a wheelchair with child safety hasn't been considered.
Heading text
12.7.1 Kitchens
Heading number portion
12.7.1
Item id
1778706298963_820
Heading id
12.7.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
h) have a sink that complies with clause 5.10.7 of CSA/ASC B652:23
What should we change it to?
Consider who the sink is for?
Why should we change it?
A sink in a dining space would more practically be used by children.
Heading text
12.7.3 Dining area
Heading number portion
12.7.3
Item id
1778706343410_6
Heading id
s12.9
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Entire section
What should we change it to?
Remove
Why should we change it?
Locker rooms are not typically a requirement of a child care facility.
Heading text
12.9 Locker rooms
Heading number portion
12.9
Item id
1778706387306_4
Heading id
s18.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: Responsibility for accessibility upkeep should be assigned to a designated accessibility coordinator
What should we change it to?
Keep responsibility more broad
Why should we change it?
Child Care centres do not have a capacity or funding for an accessibility coordinator.
Heading text
18.3 Regular upkeep
Heading number portion
18.3
Submission ID
65345
Submitted by
childcare@richmond.ca
Submitted on
Wed, 05/13/2026 - 17:16
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65349's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1778709551135_683
Heading id
s7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"This Standard applies to childcare centres that are either mandated to be accessible and/or centres that desire to label themselves as accessible."
What should we change it to?
Reconsider this scope for inclusion, by providing clarity on which centres are mandated to be accessible, and by encouraging more centres to embrace accessibility.
Why should we change it?
Current language may not encourage more centres to consider accessibility, and may not help remove barriers to accessing childcare or employment in this sector. Please reconsider the requirements for where this Standard applies.
Heading text
7.1 Inclusions
Heading number portion
7.1
Item id
1778709831776_372
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"Signage — Information provided in the form of visual and tactile communication that incorporates one or more of the following elements: a. alphanumeric characters; b. pictograms; c. illustrations (plans, etc.); or d. braille. Source: CSA/ASC B651:23-Accessible Design for the Built Environment"
What should we change it to?
Consider changing bullet point d) to say "braille and raised characters"
Why should we change it?
Not all people who rely on tactile signage can read braille, and raised characters is another important tactile format to consider in addition to braille. Incorporating this into the definition can help increase awareness that braille in combination with raised characters can provide a more inclusive approach to tactile communication. Refer to CNIB's website for additional guidance: https://clearingourpath.ca/index.php/design-needs/exteriors-and-interiors/signage/tactile-signs-raised-print-and-braille/
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778709939476_11
Heading id
10.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"Note: It is the preference that the entire site be compliant with CSA/ASC B651:23."
What should we change it to?
Consider if CSA B651:23 or CAN-ASC 2.3 should be referenced here, and why CAN-ASC 2.3 is not the primary reference for this Standard.
Why should we change it?
It is unclear why the Standard sometimes refers to CSA B651:23 and other times refers to CAN-ASC 2.3. If ASC standards are expected to be the most up-to-date standard, what is missing from ASC 2.3 that only CSA B651:23 has, and why isn't it in ASC 2.3? Something to consider. For example, for Clause 11.2.1 which references both standards, it is confusing to the reader why ASC 2.3 isn't the main referenced standard.
Heading text
10.1 Accessible sites
Heading number portion
10.1
Item id
1778710104584_408
Heading id
s10.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
(relevant to whole section)
What should we change it to?
Instead of creating sub-sections on specific aspects of parking and referencing specific sub-clauses of CSA B651, consider simply saying: "10.2 Parking Accessible parking spaces, connected accessible routes, parking signage and payment machines shall comply with Clause 9 of CSA/ASC B651:23." If there are exceptions or modifications to the clause, those can also be pointed out here.
Why should we change it?
The current language leaves gaps as only specific parts of CSA B651 are being reference. For example, 9.4.1 and 9.4.2 are referenced, but not 9.4.3 (Surface), or 9.4.4 (Signage for designated accessible parking), which are important parts of the user journey. Referencing only specific sub-clauses can also create confusion and inconsistency between standards. Please consider providing explanations for exceptions or changes to CSA B651:23 clauses so that the reader understands why there are changes, and how to correctly apply this Standard.
Heading text
10.2 Parking
Heading number portion
10.2
Item id
1778710906136_386
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
(relevant to whole section)
What should we change it to?
Consider referencing Clause 9.3 from CSA B651 and only pointing out the differences.
Why should we change it?
There are some language differences with CSA B651 Clause 9.3, which can create confusion or gaps. Consider referencing the Clause as the baseline requirement, and then listing out the exceptions or modifications.
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1778710998651_517
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"At least one drop-off and pick-up zone shall serve as a childcare centre and shall: a. be adjacent to the roadway and a path of travel;..."
What should we change it to?
Consider changing the language in bullet point a) to say: "be adjacent to the accessible route;..."
Why should we change it?
Consider changing "roadway and a path of travel" to "accessible route" as the passenger loading zone can only be considered accessible if it is connected to an accessible route. Otherwise this zone is not accessible. This edit aligns with the language used by CSA B651 Clause 9.3.1. Since ASC 2.9 is about improving accessibility, the language is very important.
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1778711110141_176
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"At least one drop-off and pick-up zone shall serve as a childcare centre and shall: ... b. provide an access aisle at street level, a minimum of 1,500 mm wide and 14,000 mm long to accommodate two vehicles; ..."
What should we change it to?
Change the language in bullet point b) to say: "provide a parallel access aisle at street level that is connected to the accessible route and is a minimum of 1,500 mm wide and 14,000 mm long to accommodate two vehicles;..."
Why should we change it?
Consider adding the requirement for the access aisle to be parallel to the zone and connected to the accessible route. This can help clarify how to design the access aisle and to ensure that it is on the side of the vehicle where doors and side ramps can access it.
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1778711251079_789
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"e. maintain a minimum clear height of 3,000 mm to the underside of any suspended or blade signage, ceilings, or other overhead obstructions."
What should we change it to?
Consider changing the language in bullet point e) to also mention the height clearance along the vehicular route from site entrance and to be identified with signage indicating clearance height, as noted in CSA B651 Clause 9.3.2.
Why should we change it?
It is unclear why these details are different from CSA B651 Clause 9.3.2 and could create gaps or confusion. Please review and either include or provide an explanatory note for why those are not required.
Heading text
10.3 Drop-off and pick-up zones
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1778711316587_412
Heading id
s11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"b. be designed to facilitate effective supervision and security with more than one feature such as but not limited to: i. electronic locking doors; ii. motion sensors; iii. security cameras; iv. keypads; or v. card readers;"
What should we change it to?
Consider adding another safety/security requirement - protect and separate pedestrian paths adjacent to a vehicular route by installing bollards, as per CSA/ASC B651:23 Clause 8.3.9.
Why should we change it?
To help separate and protect the pedestrian path or entrance that is adjacent to a vehicular route.
Heading text
11.2 Main entrance
Heading number portion
11.2
Item id
1778711452899_643
Heading id
s11.2.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"The main entrance to the building leading to the childcare centre, and the main entrance to the childcare centre shall have doorways with: a. power-assisted doors that comply with clause 5.2.9 of CSA/ASC B651:23; b. controls to allow for accessibility, while also maintaining the security and safety of the children in attendance; and c. a clear opening width of at least 950 mm complying with CAN-ASC-2.3."
What should we change it to?
Consider adding another requirement for adequate colour contrast. Can refer to Clause 5.2.10 of CSA/ASC B651:23 for guidance on glazed panels of a door, or refer to Section 5.5 of CAN-ASC-2.3.
Why should we change it?
To help someone with low vision to identify the door.
Heading text
11.2.1 Power-assisted doors and door width
Heading number portion
11.2.1
Item id
1778711708971_497
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
(relevant to whole section)
What should we change it to?
Consider adding this as a requirement or note: "Common areas should incorporate technology and assistive features to enhance accessibility. This includes, but is not limited to, assistive listening devices (e.g., hearing loops, FM systems, or other wireless technology) for children who are hard of hearing, as well as other forms of assistive technology (e.g., AAC devices, tactile output devices, adaptive switches). Voice-controlled or touchless controls for lighting, temperature, and sound adjustments should also be considered to accommodate diverse needs."
Why should we change it?
Only clauses 12.4.6 and 12.4.7 in this section have notes (Note 3) that discuss various assistive technologies, however, other spaces require them too, such as learning spaces and family/consultation/event spaces. Consider adding this note or requirement in the parent 12.4 section, or under clauses for all relevant spaces. Without these assistive technologies barriers will continue to exist in these spaces.
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1778711766191_854
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"The number and type of childcare activity spaces within a childcare centre depend on its policies and program focus. However, a childcare centre shall have a space for at least: a. one classroom; b. one therapy room; and c. one quiet room."
What should we change it to?
Consider clarifying in an explanatory note why a sensory room is not required (and not on this list), and if it is a space that is recommended to have.
Why should we change it?
Sensory rooms are described in 12.4.4 can help provide sensory stimulation to those who need it. Please clarify if this space is required; if not required, please clarify if sensory toys/features should still be present in another space if a sensory room is not available.
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1778711968432_174
Heading id
12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"Note 2: ....It is also advisable to provide chairs in multiple sizes and heights in multiple locations throughout the classroom"
What should we change it to?
Consider also mentioning the need for chairs with and without armrests.
Why should we change it?
To provide flexible options, as some people may need armrests, and for others, the armrest may present a barrier to using the chair.
Heading text
12.4 Design of childcare activity rooms
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1778712043993_743
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"e. provide a “safety bed and chair” within the space"
What should we change it to?
Consider providing an explanatory note to clarify what a "safety bed and chair" are.
Why should we change it?
It is unclear to the reader what furniture could be suitable for a safety bed and chair. Additional clarity/guidance would help with consistent application of this Standard.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1778712127909_869
Heading id
12.4.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"Note 3: In certain situations, consider adding multiple seating options."
What should we change it to?
Please provide clarity on this statement, and which situations to consider. Also, please consider always requiring some variety in seating to accommodate different users of the space.
Why should we change it?
It is unclear to the reader what situations to be aware of. Also, always providing variety of seating (even if seating could be changed from another room) would allow more users to feel comfortable. For example, seats with and without armrests, wide seats, more cozy seat, etc.
Heading text
12.4.5 Quiet rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.5
Item id
1778712314363_319
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"i. where provided, tables and chairs shall be of adjustable height;"
What should we change it to?
Please expand this bullet point, or add another bullet point, to require different seating options, with and without armrests. Also clarify the requirement the previous bullet point that requires furniture with wheels for easy reconfiguration, and require some chairs without wheels.
Why should we change it?
Variety of seating options is important for inclusion, such as different sized seats, seats with and without armrests, seats with and without wheels. Note that chairs with wheels can be unsteady for some people and can create a falling hazard. Even if the wheels can be locked, note that there could be situations where a person may not be able to reach and lock themselves. So please also require some seating options that don't have wheels.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1778712370330_277
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"l. avoid overly bright or high-contrast patterns;"
What should we change it to?
Consider referencing ASC 2.4 Clause 10.4 for additional guidance on colour patterns.
Why should we change it?
Providing additional guidance can help with consistent application of the Standard.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1778712446767_712
Heading id
12.4.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"Note 6: In certain situations, consider adding multiple seating options."
What should we change it to?
Please provide clarity on this statement, and which situations to consider. Also, please consider always requiring some variety in seating to accommodate different users of the space.
Why should we change it?
It is unclear to the reader what situations to be aware of. Also, always providing variety of seating (even if seating could be changed from another room) would allow more users to feel comfortable. For example, seats with and without armrests, wide seats, etc.
Heading text
12.4.6 Multi-purpose rooms
Heading number portion
12.4.6
Item id
1778712569425_976
Heading id
12.6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
"12.6.2 Change tables"
What should we change it to?
Consider changing the title to "Child change tables".
Why should we change it?
To avoid confusion with the adult change tables in the universal washroom, consider clarifying the title of this clause to specify that the change tables being discussed are specifically for children.
Heading text
12.6.2 Change tables
Heading number portion
12.6.2
Item id
1778712734047_568
Heading id
14.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
(relevant to whole section)
What should we change it to?
Consider including additional considerations as noted in CSA/ASC B651:23 Clause 4.7, as well as operating controls and power outlets to be in easy reach as noted in CSA/ASC B651:23 Clause 4.3.
Why should we change it?
These additional considerations and reach requirements help remind the reader of the various barriers that still exist even if there is clear space or adjustable tables. For example: adding task lighting (e.g., a lamp on the workspace) allows an individual to control lighting and improve visibility in their workspace; and, placing operating controls (e.g., switches, etc.) and power outlets within reach will prevent an individual from having to overly extend their reach or bend, which could be hazardous.
Heading text
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces
Heading number portion
14.1
Item id
1778712920703_390
Heading id
14.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
"Note 2: When purchasing goods and services, accessibility specifications should be carefully considered. The operational requirements should consider accessibility for both the staff who operate the goods or services and the individuals who will benefit from them. Since accessibility needs vary on a case-by-case basis, specifications cannot be assumed. It is essential to evaluate the specific needs of the individuals who will operate and benefit from the goods or services, identifying requirements that are both accessible and practical for them. Selecting accessible technologies that accommodate multiple accessibility needs is often the most effective approach."
What should we change it to?
Consider reviewing and rephrasing to also mention that in addition to providing the appropriate goods and services, at minimum the space should be designed with Universal Design principles to remove potential barriers and provide flexible options.
Why should we change it?
The current language could be misinterpreted as guiding the reader to be reactive to accommodation requests, rather than requiring proactive efforts to create an inclusive working environment that follows Universal Design principles.
Heading text
14.1 Accessible staff workspaces
Heading number portion
14.1
Submission ID
65349
Submitted by
saulakh@rickhansen.com
Submitted on
Wed, 05/13/2026 - 19:02
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65353's submission

CAN-ASC-4.1 Accessible Procurement
Feedback items
Item id
1778769685494_397
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

Procurement professionals can include: i. supply specialists; ii. the contracting authority; iii. contracting officers; iv. materiel management specialists; and v. procurement officers.

What should we change it to?

I suggest moving this to definitions section and say “Procurement professionals as defined in Clause X”.

Why should we change it?

This level of detail may lend itself better to the definitions section.

Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778769861747_363
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

A client is responsible for:

What should we change it to?

Remove this from the Introduction and add it to Clause 10.1.2 a) Roles and Responsibilities.

Why should we change it?

This is a requirement which should go in the body of the Standard.

Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778769991739_993
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

"Binding agreement"

What should we change it to?

Consider removing from the Definitions section.

Why should we change it?

This term is not used anywhere else in the body of the Standard.

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778770210346_810
Heading id
10.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

Policies and procedures shall state that accessibility requirements: a. be included throughout the procurement process including: i. all phases of procurement (planning, bidding and contract award, and contract management and closeout); and ii. any competitive or non-competitive solicitation and resulting method of supply such as contracts, standing offers, or supply arrangements; b. be included in the specifications for the procurement of goods and services including: i. developing evaluation criteria and throughout the evaluation process; ii. identifying testing requirements at the solicitation and contract phase; iii. developing solicitation and contract documents; and iv. delivering industry engagement activities; and

What should we change it to?

I would suggest reworking the clause to regroup all process-related elements together in a) and all specifications together in b).

Why should we change it?

Right now b) has a mix of both process and specifications when it should strictly be specifications (i.e. evaluation criteria, testing requirements, solicitation and contract documents) according to how the clause is written.

Heading text
10.1.1 Incorporating accessibility
Heading number portion
10.1.1
Item id
1778770376979_31
Heading id
10.1.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

Policies and procedures shall state that accessibility requirements:

What should we change it to?

Policies and procedures need to state that accessibility requirements shall:

Why should we change it?

The "shall" is misplaced here so the text doesn’t quite flow as smoothly with the bullets that follow.

Heading text
10.1.1 Incorporating accessibility
Heading number portion
10.1.1
Item id
1778770740389_406
Heading id
10.1.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

The ordering of requirements in this Clause.

What should we change it to?

The justification form shall: a) provide the reasons why accessibility requirements were not included in the procurement. Note: It is not sufficient to state that accessibility was "not appropriate" or " not applicable." b) provide information on the decision-making process to exclude accessibility requirements including the following activities, if applicable: i. consulting with end-users, including people with disabilities, to determine the functionality of the good, service or construction; ii. identifying accessibility standards, guidelines, and best practices; iii. consulting with subject matter experts; iv. engaging with industry to determine market capacity; v. developing a flexible procurement approach complying with Clause 10.1.3; and vi. conducting a risk-assessment for not including accessibility; and c) be signed by the client with the delegated responsibility and kept on the procurement file.

Why should we change it?

The only requirement that is directly tied to the policy is a) and everything else is tied to the written justification.

Heading text
10.1.4.1 Justification
Heading number portion
10.1.4.1
Item id
1778770887587_97
Heading id
10.1.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

provide the reasons why accessibility requirements were not included in the procurement and provide information on the decision-making process to exclude accessibility requirements, including the following activities, if applicable:

What should we change it to?

This should be a sub-bullet under point a).

Why should we change it?

Policies do not provide reasons accessibility requirements are excluded it is the responsible party (i.e. client, procurement professional, contractor) and I believe they do so as part of the written justification

Heading text
10.1.4.1 Justification
Heading number portion
10.1.4.1
Item id
1778771006553_345
Heading id
10.1.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

c. be signed by the client with the delegated responsibility and kept on the procurement file.

What should we change it to?

This requirement should be a sub-bullet under a) rather than as part of the policies opening statement.

Why should we change it?

The written justification (or Justification form) must be signed by the client, not the policy.

Heading text
10.1.4.1 Justification
Heading number portion
10.1.4.1
Item id
1778771231130_142
Heading id
11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Providing clear information in an accessible format helps individuals involved throughout a procurement process, including:

What should we change it to?

Needs a “should, shall or may” otherwise if it is just background information it needs to be a note. See CSA B651 6.4.1 General to see how general clauses are drafted.

Why should we change it?

There needs to be clarification about whether this is a requirement or just general guidance.

Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1778771398842_597
Heading id
11.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

The following requirements help clients and procurement professionals to plan accessible and inclusive engagement activities for both in-person and virtual events. Consistent, coherent, and well-coordinated engagement activities improve procurement outcomes.

What should we change it to?

“The following requirements should help clients and procurement professionals to plan accessible and inclusive engagement activities for both in-person and virtual events. Consistent, coherent, and well-coordinated engagement activities shall improve procurement outcomes.”

Why should we change it?

Need to include a should shall or may sentence here or turn this into a note.

Heading text
11.4.1 General
Heading number portion
11.4.1
Item id
1778771509666_536
Heading id
11.4.4.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

The objective of the following requirements is to expand on the need to ask attendees about accommodation requirements. Following requirements for facilities creates accessible in-person events that are inclusive for all.

What should we change it to?

“The objective of the following requirements shall expand on the need to ask attendees about accommodation requirements. Following requirements for facilities shall creates accessible in-person events that are inclusive for all.”

Why should we change it?

Needs to be drafted as a requirement or included as a note.

Heading text
11.4.4.1 General
Heading number portion
11.4.4.1
Item id
1778771617511_333
Heading id
11.4.5.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

There are additional considerations for organizers to consider when delivering virtual engagement activities. This includes accounting for digital accessibility and different accommodations to create virtual events where everyone can participate.

What should we change it to?

“There are additional considerations for organizers to consider when delivering virtual engagement activities. These activities shall account for digital accessibility and different accommodations to create virtual events where everyone can participate.”

Why should we change it?

This should contain a requirement otherwise it should be a note.

Heading text
11.4.5.1 General
Heading number portion
11.4.5.1
Item id
1778771918260_234
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

Procurement professionals can include: supply specialists; the contracting authority; contracting officers; materiel management specialists; and procurement officers.

What should we change it to?

Remove separate bullets for different types of procurement professionals, and generally simplify the intro.

Why should we change it?

Clarity

Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778772262394_865
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

This includes individuals responsible for procurement, employees who support these processes, and businesses who bid on these processes or sell their products.

What should we change it to?

Rather than list these could we remove this line and merge it with the line below to say “including the following user groups”.

Why should we change it?

It might raise questions like: a) Is “individuals responsible for procurement” the same or different than “procurement professionals?” b) Why are “employees who support these processes” not explicitly listed below.

Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778772454862_62
Heading id
s5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

A client is responsible for: defining the required capabilities, intended business outcomes, and benefits of a project, procurement, or program at its outset; and the achievement of business outcomes and benefits following implementation. A client could also commonly be referred to as: the project authority; the technical authority; and the requisitioner. Procurement policy and program service and delivery teams within organizations by ensuring that the user experience and accessibility requirements are incorporated when developing web and non-web content, websites, forms, and digital applications. This also includes, but is not limited to services such as: usage tutorials; frequently asked questions; and help desk support. End users by ensuring that individuals who use or interact with the goods or services procured are consulted throughout the procurement process to identify and remove barriers. Businesses by ensuring that the procurement process is accessible to those involved in businesses, including those owned by persons with disabilities, or where employees with disabilities support procurement processes. Businesses are also expected to demonstrate how they will meet accessibility requirements and implement them. This will be monitored and evaluated no differently than other contractual obligations.

What should we change it to?

Remove all text from "A client is responsible for;" until "This Standards aligns with the Canadian Charter..."

Why should we change it?

It’s not clear why this is in the intro. It sounds like a requirement which should go into the body of the Standard. Also, if there are all these points for what a client does then you may want to define client or do a subheading pertaining to client. Why is this important in context of the standard intro?

Heading text
6. Introduction
Heading number portion
6.
Item id
1778772711281_563
Heading id
s6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

roles and responsibilities for clients and procurement professionals;

What should we change it to?

You could have separate part further down about roles and responsibilities for clients and professionals after the scope and the definitions section which outlines what you mean by client.

Why should we change it?

This bullet is a better segue way for the paragraph about client (from the Introduction).

Heading text
7. Scope
Heading number portion
7.
Item id
1778772774809_677
Heading id
7.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

the principles should be adapted to other procurement contexts.

What should we change it to?

More detail or specification.

Why should we change it?

Lacks clarity.

Heading text
7.2 Other relevant restrictions or considerations
Heading number portion
7.2
Item id
1778772852744_948
Heading id
s7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?

it shall be to the edition listed below:

What should we change it to?

it shall be to the most recent edition of the publication listed below, including all amendments published thereto.

Why should we change it?

Keeps it current

Heading text
8. References
Heading number portion
8.
Item id
1778773045464_92
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

The selection of terms defined or omitted.

What should we change it to?

Consider why certain terms have been defined here while others have been omitted. You define some terms (tender) but not others (quotation, proposal).

Why should we change it?

Is there a reason for this and are your definitions based on industry standard language?

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778773510308_440
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Person — includes an individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, unincorporated association, unincorporated syndicate, unincorporated organization, trust, body corporate, and an individual in his or her capacity as trustee, executor, administrator or other legal representative.

What should we change it to?

person means an individual, partnership, association, body corporate, or personal representative; (personne) personal representative means a person who stands in place of and represents another person including, but not limited to, a trustee, an executor, an administrator, a liquidator of a succession, an administrator of the property of others, a guardian or tutor, a curator, a receiver or sequestrator, an agent or mandatary or an attorney; (représentant personnel)

Why should we change it?

If you define “unincorporated” entities then you should define company - unless you adopt our suggested definition from Canada Business Corporations Act. We would propose to use a definition from legislation (Canada Business Corporations Act) to ensure the term person captures different stakeholders as defined in business law. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-44/page-1.html#h-108371

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778773635987_372
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Bidder — a legal entity, person, joint venture or company that has submitted a bid in response to a solicitation.

What should we change it to?

Inclusion of the term "person" in this definition links it to a new suggested definition for that term below: person means an individual, partnership, association, body corporate, or personal representative; (personne) personal representative means a person who stands in place of and represents another person including, but not limited to, a trustee, an executor, an administrator, a liquidator of a succession, an administrator of the property of others, a guardian or tutor, a curator, a receiver or sequestrator, an agent or mandatary or an attorney; (représentant personnel)

Why should we change it?

As stated in the comment about the definition of the word "person": If you define “unincorporated” entities then you should define company - unless you adopt our suggested definition from Canada Business Corporations Act.

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778773795450_178
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Service — a service is obtained through formal arrangements such as contracts, memoranda of understanding, and letters of agreement, to support the realization of specific outcomes.

What should we change it to?

“the provision of goods, services, or construction obtained through formal arrangements such as contracts, memoranda of understanding, and letters of agreement, to support the realization of specified outcomes.”

Why should we change it?

Unclear. You don’t define what a service is only how it is obtained. Is this industry standard language?

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778773884320_478
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Supplier — a person or legal entity that provides or could provide goods, services or construction.

What should we change it to?

Supplier — a person or legal entity that provides goods, services or construction.

Why should we change it?

Including "or could provide" is not necessary.

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1778774001637_560
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?

Tender — a proposal, bid or offer that is submitted in response to an Invitation to Tender, Request for Proposal, or Request for Quotation from a contracting authority.

What should we change it to?

Suggest to combine this with definition of "bid".

Why should we change it?

This duplication adds confusion, unless this is the industry standard definition.

Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Submission ID
65353
Submitted by
sweiner
Submitted on
Thu, 05/14/2026 - 11:54
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65354's submission

CAN-ASC-4.1 Accessible Procurement
Feedback items
Item id
1778780709544_674
Heading id
9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Add a definition for "Agreement or contract"
What should we change it to?
Agreement or contract -- an agreement between a party/person procuring a good, service, or construction, and a supplier that establishes the terms and conditions for the provision of goods or services. This agreement obligates both parties to fulfill their respective commitments as specified within the contract.
Why should we change it?
Key term
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Submission ID
65354
Submitted by
sweiner
Submitted on
Thu, 05/14/2026 - 13:45
Consent to contact
Yes

Pagination

  • First page first
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Current page 63
  • Page 64
  • Page 65
  • Next page Next
  • Last page last

Report a problem on this page

Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply (required)

Share widget block

Date modified:
2026-08-02

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Accessibility Standards Canada

  • Login
  • Create an account

About government

Government of Canada

  • All contacts
  • Departments and agencies
  • About government

Themes and topics

  • Jobs
  • Immigration and citizenship
  • Travel and tourism
  • Business
  • Benefits
  • Health
  • Taxes
  • Environment and natural resources
  • National security and defence
  • Culture, history and sport
  • Policing, justice and emergencies
  • Transport and infrastructure
  • Canada and the world
  • Money and finances
  • Science and innovation
  • Indigenous Peoples
  • Veterans and military
  • Youth
  • Manage life events

Brand

  • Social Media
  • Mobile Applications
  • About Canada.ca
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Site map
Top of Page
Symbol of the Government of Canada