• Skip to main content
  • Skip to "About government"

Language switcher

  • Françaisfr
Government of Canada / Gouvernement du Canada

Search Accessbility Standards Canada


Use the Left and Right arrow keys to navigate between the top level menu items. Press the ENTER key or double tap the SPACEBAR to select a menu item. To navigate through a sub menu, Press the SPACEBAR or the Down arrow key. Use the Up and Down arrow keys to navigate through submenu items. Press the Enter or SPACEBAR to select a submenu item. Press the ESCAPE key to close the submenu and return to the top level.

Main navigation

  • Home
    • About us
    • Accessibility Plan 2025
    • Get involved
    • Reports and publications
    • Transparency
    • Consultations
    • Organizational structure
  • Accessibility standards
    • Standards and technical guides database
    • Standards under public review
    • Technical committees
    • Work program
  • Funding research
    • Funded research project database
  • Centre of Expertise
  • Contact us
  • Login

Mobile Menu

  • Home
    • About us
    • Accessibility Plan 2025
    • Get involved
    • Reports and publications
    • Transparency
    • Consultations
    • Organizational structure
  • Accessibility standards
    • Standards and technical guides database
    • Standards under public review
    • Technical committees
    • Work program
  • Funding research
    • Funded research project database
  • Centre of Expertise
  • Contact us
  • Login

You are here

  1. Canada.ca
  2. Accessibility Standards Canada
  3. Search results

Search results


Displaying 601 - 610 of 785

Individual 65000's submission

CAN-ASC-2.9 – Accessible Childcare Centres
Feedback items
Item id
1774473230946_708
Heading id
s0
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The language used throughout this section is deficit-based, focusing on “impairment,” “functional limitation,” and barriers arising from disability. From our perspective, this framing does not fully reflect current best practices in inclusive and neurodiversity-affirming language, particularly in early childhood contexts. Increasingly, organizations, educators, and families are shifting toward strengths-based approaches that recognize neurological and developmental differences as part of human diversity, rather than solely as impairments.
What should we change it to?
We recommend maintaining alignment with the Accessible Canada Act definition of disability, while supplementing it with strengths-based, inclusive language that reflects evolving best practices. Suggested addition: “While disability is defined in accordance with the Accessible Canada Act, Accessibility Standards Canada recognizes that children and individuals may also identify using strengths-based language, including neurodiversity and other affirming terms. This includes children with visible and invisible disabilities, whose needs may not be immediately apparent but are equally important to recognize and support. Accessibility efforts should respect and reflect diverse ways of understanding and describing human differences.”
Why should we change it?
Language shapes how standards are interpreted and applied. In early childhood settings, deficit-based language can reinforce stigma. A simple addition allows the standard to stay legally aligned while reflecting current, inclusive practice and how families actually talk about and to their children.
Heading text
1. Accessibility Standards Canada: About us
Heading number portion
1.
Item id
1774473273214_620
Heading id
s6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The section outlines where and how the standard applies, but it reads as fairly rigid. It does not acknowledge that childcare settings vary significantly (e.g., size, location, type of operator), which can impact how requirements are realistically implemented.
What should we change it to?
You could add language such as: “This standard is intended to be applied across a range of childcare settings, and implementation should consider differences in scale, location, and available resources while maintaining the intent of accessibility.”
Why should we change it?
Without this, there’s a risk of inconsistent or impractical application, especially in smaller or rural settings. Acknowledging variability upfront supports better adoption while still keeping the accessibility goals intact.
Heading text
6.1 Importance of accessibility in childcare centres
Heading number portion
6.1
Item id
1774473314539_628
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The section highlights design strategies like reducing overstimulation and providing sensory spaces, but it focuses on the physical environment. It does not acknowledge that group size and staffing ratios are also a key part of accessible design in practice.
What should we change it to?
Add a short statement recognizing the role of group size and staffing. For example: “Accessible design in childcare centres should also consider group size and staffing ratios, as these directly impact a child’s ability to regulate, participate, and receive appropriate support, particularly for children with invisible disabilities such as sensory sensitivities, communication differences, or attention-related needs.” One policy idea would be to assign weighted ratios based on the needs of children within the group and their support needs.
Why should we change it?
Even with strong physical design, large group sizes can make environments overwhelming and inaccessible for many children. In practice, staffing and ratios are just as important as space design in reducing overstimulation and supporting participation. Without acknowledging this, the section feels incomplete.
Heading text
6.2 Overview of accessible design in childcare centres
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774473355630_882
Heading id
s7.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
The section references “relevant authorities having jurisdiction” without clearly defining who that includes or how consistency will be ensured across jurisdictions.
What should we change it to?
Define who the authorities are and also set out expectations of equitable access across the country. I.e.: “For the purposes of this standard, ‘authorities having jurisdiction’ should be clearly defined and applied consistently across provinces and territories.” And/or: “Implementation should aim for consistent expectations across jurisdictions to support equitable access to accessible childcare in Canada.”
Why should we change it?
As written, this leaves too much room for variation. If different jurisdictions interpret or apply the standard differently, accessibility will not be consistent across the country. That creates inequity for families depending on where they live, which runs counter to the intent of a national standard.
Heading text
7.3 Applications
Heading number portion
7.3
Item id
1774473398637_239
Heading id
s7.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The section outlines implementation expectations but does not address workforce capacity, particularly in rural and remote areas. There is no mention of how centres will access trained staff or whether training supports will be available for existing employees.
What should we change it to?
Add a short statement such as: “Implementation should consider workforce capacity, including access to trained staff in rural and remote areas. Consideration should be given to training and other supports to enable consistent application of this standard.”
Why should we change it?
Without addressing staffing and training, implementation will vary significantly by location. Centres in urban areas may be able to meet expectations, while rural and remote centres may not. That creates inequitable access to accessible childcare based on geography, which undermines the intent of the standard.
Heading text
7.4 Limits
Heading number portion
7.4
Item id
1774473438405_995
Heading id
15.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The section focuses on reducing noise levels and improving acoustics, but it treats this primarily as a comfort issue rather than an accessibility requirement tied to participation and regulation.
What should we change it to?
Add a short clarification such as: “Acoustic design should support children’s ability to regulate, communicate, and participate in programming, particularly for those who are sensitive to noise or auditory input.”
Why should we change it?
For many neurodiverse children, noise is not just uncomfortable, it's a barrier to participation. Framing acoustics as an accessibility requirement, not just a design feature, helps ensure it is prioritized appropriately in implementation.
Heading text
15.3 Acoustic design
Heading number portion
15.3
Item id
1774473619389_491
Heading id
s0
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
This is feedback on the overall standard - there was nowhere to add it at the end. The standard focuses on physical and environmental design but does not clearly address how individual needs will be consistently understood and supported across staff, settings, and transitions. There is also limited reference to staff training in neurodiversity and how that training connects to day-to-day implementation.
What should we change it to?
Add language such as: “Implementation of this standard should include staff training on a range of neurodiverse profiles and support needs, as well as tools to document and communicate individual accessibility requirements.” In addition, consideration should be given to structured tools that support consistency across staff. Horizon Education Foundation is developing a Canada Student Support Plan (CSSP) prototype document embedded in its National Education Framework initiative, which outlines key information such as student strengths, communication preferences, sensory sensitivities, triggers and effective supports. “The use of individualized child profiles (e.g., a ‘child passport’) can support continuity across staff, reduce reliance on informal knowledge, and improve consistency in how accessibility supports are applied.” In practice, accessibility often breaks down due to inconsistency. Families are required to repeatedly explain their child’s needs, and supports vary depending on staffing. Standardizing both training and how information is captured and shared improves consistency, reduces gaps in care, and leads to better outcomes for children. Tools like the Student Passport provide a practical way to operationalize accessibility beyond the physical environment and ensure that supports are actually implemented day to day.
Why should we change it?
Accessibility in practice depends not only on physical design, but on how consistently individual needs are understood and supported across staff, settings, and daily interactions. Without clear expectations for training and information-sharing, implementation becomes inconsistent and dependent on individual staff knowledge or experience. This is particularly important for children with invisible disabilities, whose needs may not be immediately apparent but can significantly impact their ability to participate, regulate, and communicate within childcare environments. Without structured approaches, these needs are more likely to be overlooked or inconsistently supported. Currently, families often carry the burden of repeatedly explaining their child’s needs, and supports can vary depending on staffing, transitions, or setting. This creates gaps in care and undermines the intent of accessibility. By embedding requirements for staff training and standardized tools to document and communicate individual needs, the standard can move beyond physical accessibility and ensure that supports are applied consistently in practice. This leads to more equitable, predictable, and effective outcomes for all children.
Heading text
1. Accessibility Standards Canada: About us
Heading number portion
1.
Submission ID
65000
Submitted by
Romy@horizoned.ca
Submitted on
Wed, 03/25/2026 - 17:20
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65010's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774544435446_220
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
i. Empowerment and independence: Wayfinding and signage in its various forms allow for autonomy and independent navigation, providing timely, accurate, and clear information in multiple formats when necessary.
What should we change it to?
Empowerment and independence: Wayfinding and signage in its various forms allow for autonomy and independent navigation, providing timely, accurate, and clear information in multiple formats when necessary, without the need for human assistance.
Why should we change it?
The additional language will further emphasize and reinforce that the fullest level of autonomy and independence is only achieved when individuals can access information and navigate spaces without the need for human or staff assistance. While human assistance must always be available where possible, solutions that rely upon it do not reflect true independence and autonomy for individuals with disabilities.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774544607082_37
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
k. User consultation: Implementers and designers carry out consultation with user groups when establishing/determining or altering the wayfinding and signage solutions.
What should we change it to?
k. User consultation: Implementers and designers carry out consultation and user testing with user groups representing a diversity of lived disability experiences and communication methods when establishing/determining or altering the wayfinding and signage solutions. Individuals with lived experience must be meaningfully engaged throughout projects from the outset, including design, testing, implementation, and evaluation phases.
Why should we change it?
Wayfinding and signage systems are most effective when they are designed with, not just for, people with disabilities. Multi-sensory design and user testing improve safety, predictability, and independence. Ensuring the robust inclusion of persons with disabilities for consultation and user testing throughout project development, implementation, and evaluation will better ensure solutions that reflect a diversity of lived experiences and the broader public benefit of accessible design.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774544671306_233
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
In all aspects of wayfinding and signage, the following principles apply: …
What should we change it to?
Include an additional principle (i.e., subsection 6.2.l) stating that regulated entities shall aim for the highest level of accessibility and usability possible, rather than minimum requirements for technical compliance.
Why should we change it?
This additional principle will support the development of innovative solutions that support the advancement and mainstreaming of robust approaches to accessibility, as well as ensuring regulated entities strive for the highest achievable level of accessibility and inclusion.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774544751976_591
Heading id
s10.1.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
b. consider the following: … iii. consistency and dispersion of luminance…
What should we change it to?
iii. consistency and dispersion of luminance throughout interior and exterior spaces and along paths of travel.
Why should we change it?
The additional language reinforces the need to consider lighting factors throughout the relevant environment which may impact the visibility and usability of wayfinding and signage features, rather than focusing only on considerations for lighting in the immediate vicinity of the feature.
Heading text
10.1.2 General lighting design
Heading number portion
10.1.2
Item id
1774544915714_930
Heading id
heading-29
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Lighting design shall… d. incorporate supplementary lighting, with upward or downward components only, to enhance: i. special features and key orientation elements; ii. key signage and orientation landmarks; and iii. communication or information systems.
What should we change it to?
Add language clarifying that supplementary lighting must be maintained across key environmental elements such as doors, stairs, handrails, elevators, and decision points, as well as supporting the visibility of architectural and navigational cues.
Why should we change it?
The additional language provides greater clarity around the meaning of “special features and key orientation elements” to generate a more consistent understanding for regulated entities.
Heading text
10.1.2.1 Basic lighting considerations
Heading number portion
10.1.2.1
Item id
1774544995465_346
Heading id
heading-31
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Designers should prevent glare and shadow by: …
What should we change it to?
Designers shall prevent glare and shadow by: … and include an additional point specifying that light sources should not be partially or fully obstructed, as this can create shadows on the illuminated target and reduce visibility.
Why should we change it?
Lighting directly affects the ability of people with low vision to orient themselves, detect hazards, and identify key features in the environment. Inconsistent lighting and glare can significantly reduce usability and safety even when other accessibility features are present. Accordingly, reducing glare and shadow must be a requirement of the Standard, rather than a recommendation. In addition, obstructed light sources can unintentionally create shadows that reduce visibility and clarity of important features such as signage or pathways. Including this requirement ensures that lighting design supports consistent visibility and reduces barriers for individuals with low vision.
Heading text
10.1.3.1 Preventing glare and shadow
Heading number portion
10.1.3.1
Item id
1774545094490_59
Heading id
s11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
b. provide supportive measures in combinations, i.e., audible and tactile; audible and visual …
What should we change it to?
Revise subsection (b) to state that wayfinding systems shall provide supportive measures that include audible, visual, and tactile features together, rather than in partial combinations, wherever possible.
Why should we change it?
The current wording suggests that combinations of two communication methods may be sufficient. This may result in minimum compliance approaches where only two formats are provided, even when it is feasible to include all three. Wayfinding is most effective when users can rely on multiple sources of information simultaneously. Requiring the inclusion of audible, visual, and tactile features ensures a more consistent, inclusive, and user-centered approach that supports a broader range of needs and abilities.
Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1774545157302_638
Heading id
s11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Wayfinding shall: (subsections [a] through [f])
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., 11.1.g) stating the need to ensure wayfinding systems should be applied consistently across buildings and facilities to improve predictability.
Why should we change it?
While the Standard mentions the need for consistent and predictable implementation of wayfinding and signage solutions in other sections, it should be highlighted under section 11.1 to emphasize this point and ensure it is recognized as a key principle for effective solutions.
Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1774545233938_615
Heading id
s11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Wayfinding shall: (subsections [a] through [f])
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., 11.1.h) stating that the design of wayfinding solutions must consider the spatial needs of guide dog users, persons travelling with guides, and those communicating side-by-side using sign language.
Why should we change it?
Spatial considerations are key to designing effective wayfinding solutions that meet the travel needs of persons with diverse disabilities and communication methods.
Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1774545286788_833
Heading id
s11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Wayfinding shall: … e. have detectable paths of travel with visual contrast against adjacent walls to facilitate navigation in large or highly complex buildings and extensive areas …
What should we change it to?
Revise the wording to reflect that detectable paths of travel should include visual contrast in all cases, with particular consideration required for highly complex buildings and extensive areas.
Why should we change it?
While complex and/or extensive areas may necessitate more robust consideration and solutions for visual contrast to detect paths of travel, there should be consideration given to this matter in all cases.
Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1774545418483_271
Heading id
s11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: Where protruding objects cannot be removed, they should be placed outside paths of travel or recessed so as not to reduce the width required for unobstructed passage for all persons.
What should we change it to?
Revise the note to include a requirement that protruding objects must also be cane-detectable where they cannot be removed or recessed.
Why should we change it?
Protruding objects that are not cane-detectable can pose significant safety risks for individuals who are blind or partially sighted. Including cane detectability ensures that hazards can be identified safely and supports independent navigation.
Heading text
11.2 Obstacles
Heading number portion
11.2
Item id
1774545473798_833
Heading id
s11.2.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Paths of travel shall: … d./e. have maintenance plans with provisions for the clearing and repair of all wayfinding and signage elements that are part of the space.
What should we change it to?
d./e. have maintenance plans with provisions for the clearing and repair of all wayfinding and signage elements that are part of the space, ensuring accessible routes and wayfinding elements remain available, consistent, and detectable at all times for all users, including white cane users and guide dog handlers.
Why should we change it?
This strengthens the requirement by ensuring continuous maintenance so routes remain accessible and unobstructed. People who are blind or partially sighted are particularly impacted by inconsistent or non-detectable obstacles, which can affect safety and independent navigation.
Heading text
11.2.1 Obstacles on paths of travel
Heading number portion
11.2.1
Item id
1774545535165_465
Heading id
s11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
a) support orientation and wayfinding at critical navigation points through additional illumination, increased visual contrast, and tactile elements, such as material changes (textural changes) or TWSI.
What should we change it to?
Include an additional requirement specifying that information about the meaning of textural changes or tactile elements should be made available in accessible formats (e.g., website, accessibility page, or other communication methods).
Why should we change it?
Textural changes are often used to convey important wayfinding information, but their meaning may not be clearly understood by all users. Providing accessible information about what these elements represent improves usability and ensures individuals can interpret navigation cues effectively.
Heading text
11.3 Walking surfaces of interior and exterior paths of travel
Heading number portion
11.3
Item id
1774545631450_594
Heading id
s11.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
11.4 Tactile Walking Surface Indicator (TWSI)
What should we change it to?
Revise the introduction to include clear definitions of TWSIs and the different types (e.g., attention and directional indicators), including their purpose and use.
Why should we change it?
The current introduction lacks clear definitions, which may reduce understanding and consistent application. Providing definitions at the outset improves clarity and supports correct implementation. Additional guidance can be found in CNIB’s Clearing Our Path resource.
Heading text
11.4 Tactile Walking Surface Indicator (TWSI)
Heading number portion
11.4
Item id
1774545704766_225
Heading id
heading-50
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
TWSIs shall: (subsections [a] through [e])
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., subsection 11.4.1.1.f) specifying that TWSI design and implementation must involve user testing with persons who are blind, Deafblind, or have low vision, including white cane users, to ensure effectiveness and usability.
Why should we change it?
TWSIs are one of the most important non-visual navigation tools available in the built environment. Their effectiveness depends on consistency and correct application. User testing with individuals who have lived experience must be a standard component of TWSI implementation to ensure proper design and placement.
Heading text
11.4.1.1 General requirements
Heading number portion
11.4.1.1
Item id
1774545769481_440
Heading id
heading-51
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
b) ensure clear differentiation between direction and attention indicators for individuals who rely on them for navigation;
What should we change it to?
Include additional guidance referencing standardized definitions, layouts, and detection methods for different TWSI types to support consistent application.
Why should we change it?
Clear differentiation is critical, but additional guidance is needed to ensure consistent understanding and implementation. Providing more detailed reference material supports effective navigation and reduces confusion.
Heading text
11.4.1.2 TWSI detection
Heading number portion
11.4.1.2
Item id
1774545853441_630
Heading id
s11.4.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: When installed at the bottom of a ramp ensure that a proper setback is used so that wheeled mobility device users are not destabilized at the bottom of the ramp but detection of the ramp is still possible for other users requiring the warning.
What should we change it to?
Revise the note to clarify placement requirements and ensure consistency with the primary requirement that TWSIs are installed at the top of stairs and ramps.
Why should we change it?
The current note may create confusion regarding placement expectations. Clarifying this requirement will support consistent application and reduce misinterpretation.
Heading text
11.4.2 Attention indicator surfaces
Heading number portion
11.4.2
Item id
1774545919228_889
Heading id
heading-55
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
b) be positioned 300 mm from the sidewalk edge when indicating a pedestrian crossing; d) be positioned 300 mm away from the curb edge when used to mark at-grade curbs separating sidewalks from vehicle lanes;
What should we change it to?
Revise the setback distance from 300 mm to 150–200 mm, consistent with CNIB Clearing Our Path recommendations.
Why should we change it?
A larger setback distance may increase crossing time and create safety risks. A reduced distance improves efficiency and safety while maintaining detectability.
Heading text
11.4.2.3 Placement
Heading number portion
11.4.2.3
Item id
1774546008510_608
Heading id
heading-65
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: Direction indicators are not yellow to differentiate from attention indicators.
What should we change it to?
Revise the note to provide clearer guidance on colour differentiation, including recommended colour use for each type of TWSI to support consistency.
Why should we change it?
The current note assumes attention indicators are always yellow, which may not be consistent across environments. Providing clearer guidance or recommended colour standards improves consistency and usability.
Heading text
11.4.3.2 Luminance contrast
Heading number portion
11.4.3.2
Item id
1774546062605_411
Heading id
s12.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Signage shall: … c. include tactile text, graphical symbols, pictograms, and braille when installed within lateral reach or frontal reach…
What should we change it to?
c. be installed within lateral reach or frontal reach wherever possible, and when installed within lateral or frontal reach shall include tactile text, graphical symbols, pictograms, and braille.
Why should we change it?
Placing signage within lateral and/or frontal reach should be considered standard whenever the space permits to maximize the availability of tactile text and braille, as well as make it easier to read for individuals with a shorter depth of vision.
Heading text
12.1 General
Heading number portion
12.1
Item id
1774546109525_908
Heading id
s12.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Signage shall: (subsections [a] through [i])
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., subsection 12.1.j) specifying that signage should incorporate multiple communication systems (e.g., audible, visual, tactile) whenever possible, and that alternatives for signage should be made available where possible.
Why should we change it?
Providing options that enable a broader range of individuals to access and interpret signage should always be considered and implemented to the greatest extent possible for maximum accessibility. As digital wayfinding solutions (e.g., wayfinding apps specific to certain buildings or locations) become more common, these options should be provided when available.
Heading text
12.1 General
Heading number portion
12.1
Item id
1774546155557_453
Heading id
s12.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Signage shall: (subsections [a] through [i])
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., subsection 12.1.k) specifying that effective signage should support independent navigation without the need for human or staff assistance.
Why should we change it?
While accessible customer service and assistance is essential to ensure safety and accessibility, there should be an expectation that effective signage is designed such that individuals with disabilities can access information and navigate spaces without needing to rely on others. This additional language will further underscore the overarching objective of making spaces fully inclusive and accessible for everyone regardless of their communication and/or wayfinding methods.
Heading text
12.1 General
Heading number portion
12.1
Item id
1774546220318_486
Heading id
s12.2.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note 2: Signs not related to safety, wayfinding, or essential access, such as decorative displays or informal community notices (e.g. bake sales), should follow best practices for legibility and placement, but accessibility requirements are not mandatory.
What should we change it to?
Revise the note to clarify that where accessibility requirements are not applied, alternative accessible methods (e.g., staff or volunteer assistance) must be provided to ensure access to information.
Why should we change it?
Excluding certain signage from accessibility requirements may limit access to information for individuals with sight loss. Providing alternative access ensures inclusivity and aligns with accessibility principles.
Heading text
12.2.6 Temporary signs
Heading number portion
12.2.6
Item id
1774546281469_785
Heading id
s12.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Information provided by signs shall: a) be clear, concise, and use plain language; b) use familiar words, symbols, and formats; and c) be provided in alternative formats where required.
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., subsection 12.3.d) specifying that signage should include a QR code, website link, or contact information (preferably a phone number) to access additional information in accessible formats.
Why should we change it?
Providing access to additional information through accessible channels supports individuals who may require more detailed or alternative formats. Including a phone number ensures access for individuals who may not use digital tools.
Heading text
12.3 Quality of information
Heading number portion
12.3
Item id
1774546362990_664
Heading id
s12.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Information provided by signs shall: a) be clear, concise, and use plain language; b) use familiar words, symbols, and formats; and c) be provided in alternative formats where required.
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., subsection 12.3.d) specifying that information provided by signs should be validated through user testing with persons with disabilities, including individuals who are blind, partially sighted, and Deafblind, to ensure clarity, comprehension, and usability.
Why should we change it?
While the current requirements emphasize plain language and alternative formats, they do not explicitly require validation through real-world user testing. Testing with persons with disabilities helps ensure that information is not only technically accessible but also meaningful, understandable, and usable in practice. This aligns with the principle of “nothing without us” and supports more effective and inclusive wayfinding systems.
Heading text
12.3 Quality of information
Heading number portion
12.3
Item id
1774546435997_934
Heading id
s12.7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
12.7.1 Tactile sign design and build elements Tactile signs shall: a) include raised characters; b) include braille; c) use high contrast between characters and background; d) use non-glare finishes; and e) be designed and constructed to be durable.
What should we change it to?
Include an additional requirement specifying that tactile signage should be regularly inspected and maintained to ensure that tactile elements (e.g., raised text and braille) remain legible, intact, and effective over time.
Why should we change it?
Tactile signage is subject to wear and tear, particularly in high-traffic areas. Over time, braille dots and raised characters can degrade, reducing readability and accessibility. Including a clear requirement for ongoing maintenance ensures that signage continues to meet accessibility needs throughout its lifecycle, rather than only at the point of installation.
Heading text
12.7 Tactile signs
Heading number portion
12.7
Item id
1774546503141_57
Heading id
s12.10.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Audible signs shall: a) be loud enough to be easily heard, the volume may need to be increased depending upon the ambient noise level complying with Clause 12.10.3; and b) be functional during a power outage.
What should we change it to?
Revise the clause to clarify that audible signage must provide information that is equivalent in content and timeliness to visual and tactile signage, ensuring equal access to all users. Revise subsection (a) to include that audible signage must also use an appropriate speech rate and clarity to ensure information is understandable.
Why should we change it?
Audible signage should not provide limited or supplementary information compared to visual signage. Ensuring equivalency in content and timing supports equitable access and prevents situations where individuals who rely on audio receive incomplete or delayed information. This aligns with accessibility principles that prioritize equal access rather than alternative or secondary access. In addition to volume, the speed and clarity of speech are critical for comprehension. If speech is too fast or unclear, information may not be usable, particularly in noisy environments. Including this requirement improves accessibility and usability
Heading text
12.10.1 General
Heading number portion
12.10.1
Item id
1774546550301_804
Heading id
s12.11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Digital signs shall: a) present information in a format that is accessible; b) not rely solely on colour to convey information; and c) not include flashing content.
What should we change it to?
Revise subsection 12.11.1.a to specify that digital signage must conform to recognized accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG Level AA or higher) and be compatible with assistive technologies.
Why should we change it?
The phrase “accessible format” is broad and open to interpretation. Aligning digital signage with established accessibility standards such as WCAG ensures consistency, accountability, and measurable compliance, while supporting compatibility with screen readers and other assistive technologies.
Heading text
12.11.1 General
Heading number portion
12.11.1
Item id
1774546596657_496
Heading id
s12.11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Digital signs shall: a) not scroll information; b) not require the user to track moving text; and c) present information in a manner that allows it to be read and understood.
What should we change it to?
Include an additional subsection (i.e., subsection 12.11.2.d) specifying that digital signage must provide auditory output or compatibility with assistive technologies to ensure access for individuals who cannot perceive visual information.
Why should we change it?
Even when visual content is presented clearly, it may still be inaccessible to individuals who are blind or partially sighted. Providing auditory alternatives or ensuring compatibility with assistive technologies supports equitable access and aligns with multi-sensory design principles.
Heading text
12.11.2 Usage
Heading number portion
12.11.2
Item id
1774546641473_834
Heading id
s13.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Maintenance of wayfinding systems shall ensure that all components remain functional, visible, and accessible.
What should we change it to?
Include an additional requirement specifying that maintenance must prioritize critical accessibility elements such as tactile signage, braille, audible systems, lighting, and digital accessibility features.
Why should we change it?
Not all elements of wayfinding systems have the same impact on accessibility. Prioritizing key accessibility features ensures that the most critical components for independent navigation are maintained consistently, reducing the risk of barriers for individuals with disabilities.
Heading text
13.1 General
Heading number portion
13.1
Item id
1774546688537_757
Heading id
s13.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Wayfinding systems shall be reviewed periodically to ensure continued effectiveness.
What should we change it to?
Revise the clause to specify that periodic reviews must include consultation with persons with disabilities, including individuals who are blind, partially sighted, and Deafblind, to assess real-world usability and effectiveness.
Why should we change it?
Periodic review is essential, but without input from individuals with lived experience, systems may continue to meet technical requirements while failing in practice. Including consultation ensures that wayfinding systems remain effective, relevant, and responsive to user needs over time.
Heading text
13.3 Design
Heading number portion
13.3
Submission ID
65010
Submitted by
rosalyn.commisso@cnib.ca
Submitted on
Thu, 03/26/2026 - 13:36
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65020's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774633882135_110
Heading id
s0
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?

Test

What should we change it to?

Test

Why should we change it?

Test

Heading text
1. Accessibility Standards Canada: About us
Heading number portion
1.
Submission ID
65020
Submitted by
jfaubert
Submitted on
Fri, 03/27/2026 - 13:51
Consent to contact
No

Individual 65021's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774647002025_746
Heading id
s7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
recognizes the equity rights of persons with disabilities as Canadian citizens
What should we change it to?
recognizes the equity rights of all persons with disabilities in Canada
Why should we change it?
Equity and accessibility rights in Canada apply to all individuals, not just citizens, so the current wording is unnecessarily exclusionary.
Heading text
7.1 General
Heading number portion
7.1
Submission ID
65021
Submitted by
cliff_feng@hotmail.com
Submitted on
Fri, 03/27/2026 - 17:31
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65025's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774797554502_704
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
No alt-text was included for images present in the draft document.
What should we change it to?
Any images reproduced in the final published document will have alt-text describing those images.
Why should we change it?
All documents should themselves be accessible and all images should be described so that everyone receives the same information.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774797733120_785
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Alternate format — Information presented in braille, in large print, electronically (e.g., on removable or portable media), or in an accessible format.
What should we change it to?
Remove this definition and replace all instances in the standard with “Accessible Format”.
Why should we change it?
The definition is almost the same as that for “Accessible Format”, and the word “accessible” is much clearer than the word “alternate”.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774797848933_887
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: Large print is considered to be 14 point or larger sans serif font.
What should we change it to?
Remove above text.
Why should we change it?
Wiser to add a separate definition of “large print”.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774797986474_445
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Cane-detectable — An object or surface texture modification that can be identified within the reach of a long white cane.
What should we change it to?
Cane-detectable — An object or surface texture modification that is within the reach of a long white cane tip, at or near ground level, that can be reliably identified.
Why should we change it?
Score lines etched into the pavement have been used as a warning at curbs but they are not reliably detectable. They would still be acceptable with the original definition. Also over head signs can be identified by a long white cane if you reach the cane up, so near or ground level is important.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774798265924_100
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add definition.
What should we change it to?
Large print — text that is 16 to 18 point or larger.
Why should we change it?
Defining this parameter is preferable to defining it several times inconsistently throughout the standard, as is now the case. This comes from the Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB) Clear Print guidelines. They don’t treat it as a single fixed size for every situation. Instead, they frame it as a range that improves readability for people with low vision, with flexibility depending on the audience. In practice: 16–18 pt standard “large print” for most documents 18+ pt often used when the audience has more significant vision loss. Headings may go even larger to support navigation.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774798560229_523
Heading id
s10.1.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
a) incorporate the following: i) colour rendering (minimum Ra > 80); ii) colour temperature around 3000 K; and iii) colour rendering index between 60 CRI and 70 CRI; and
What should we change it to?
a) incorporate the following: I) colour rendering (minimum Ra > 90); ii) colour temperature around 3000 K; and iii) colour rendering index between 90 CRI and 100 CRI; and
Why should we change it?
Best for those with low vision by enhancing contrast, distinguishing between similar colours, and maximizing visual acuity. For low vision, a high Color Rendering Index (CRI) of 90 or higher is strongly recommended to enhance contrast, make colours appear vivid, and improve visual accuracy.
Heading text
10.1.2 General lighting design
Heading number portion
10.1.2
Item id
1774798693526_711
Heading id
s10.1.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add another point to clause b).
What should we change it to?
v) lighting should be down-cast and not directed horizontally into lines of sight.
Why should we change it?
For low vision, directing light into lines of sight can be disorienting.
Heading text
10.1.2 General lighting design
Heading number portion
10.1.2
Item id
1774798953566_178
Heading id
heading-29
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add another clause.
What should we change it to?
e) ensure indoor spaces are lit to a minimum of 200 lx for interior paths of travel, stairs, ramps and escalators.
Why should we change it?
100 lx is fine for general rooms. 200 lx provides better visibility for paths of travel for those with low vision, to prevent potential trip or fall hazards.
Heading text
10.1.2.1 Basic lighting considerations
Heading number portion
10.1.2.1
Item id
1774799146284_251
Heading id
s10.1.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
b) ensure that the UGR value does not exceed 22 in circulation areas and does not exceed 19 in habitable rooms
What should we change it to?
b) ensure that the UGR value does not exceed 16 in circulation areas and does not exceed 13 in habitable rooms
Why should we change it?
Low vision often increases sensitivity to contrast and glare, making even “acceptable” levels (UGR-19) uncomfortable.
Heading text
10.1.3 Glare and shadow
Heading number portion
10.1.3
Item id
1774799323514_664
Heading id
heading-33
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
b) integrate artificial and natural lighting to provide comfortable, evenly distributed light at working surfaces and throughout circulation routes, at all times;
What should we change it to?
b) integrate artificial and natural lighting to provide comfortable, evenly distributed light at floor level and circulation routes, to minimize pools of light or shadows;
Why should we change it?
Working surfaces should have separate task lighting and floor level lighting consistency is key, as those with low vision focus their attention to this area as they move around.
Heading text
10.1.4.1 Natural and artificial lighting
Heading number portion
10.1.4.1
Item id
1774799490616_700
Heading id
heading-33
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
f) support visual tasks, such as identifying hazards, reading signs, navigating spaces and interpreting sign language; and
What should we change it to?
f) rooms and spaces should have multi-zoned lighting fixtures and options for spot lighting to support tasks for work surfaces, identifying hazards, reading signs, navigating spaces, increase visibility to speakers and interpreting sign language; and
Why should we change it?
Work surfaces were covered under evenly distributed lighting and should have separate task lighting. Visibility to speakers should be added.
Heading text
10.1.4.1 Natural and artificial lighting
Heading number portion
10.1.4.1
Item id
1774799621701_974
Heading id
heading-34
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
b) for surface-mounted fluorescent ceiling fixtures installed below 2440 mm: i) use darkened sides (i.e. not wrap-around lenses); and ii) position them perpendicular to the dominant direction of travel, or as valance-type lighting along the perimeter of a space to create indirect lighting; and
What should we change it to?
Remove above clause
Why should we change it?
Fluorescent lighting is not recommended for people with low vision due to high glare, flickering, and harsh blue light, which can cause headaches, eye strain, and reduced contrast sensitivity. It often causes excessive discomfort, especially for those with macular degeneration or cataracts.
Heading text
10.1.4.2 Indoor light fixtures
Heading number portion
10.1.4.2
Item id
1774799736079_395
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add another note.
What should we change it to?
Note: Prioritize matte finishes. Use non-glossy or matte paint to minimize glare and reflections.
Why should we change it?
Glare and reflections can obscure signage and create tripping hazards for those with low vision.
Heading text
10.3 Colour choice
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1774799833492_637
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add another note.
What should we change it to?
Note: Use bold contrasting colours like safety yellow for stair edges, handrails, door frames, and tactile warning tiles.
Why should we change it?
Bold contrasting colours like yellow are highly visible and commonly used.
Heading text
10.3 Colour choice
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1774800056844_383
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add another note.
What should we change it to?
Note: Keep sign colours and layouts consistent throughout the environment.
Why should we change it?
Consistency avoids confusion.
Heading text
10.3 Colour choice
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1774800195810_788
Heading id
s11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Wayfinding is facilitated by well-designed indoor and outdoor environments that incorporate clear paths of travel, along with constructed and natural navigation cues such as edges, landmarks, signage, surface textures, lighting, and acoustics that can be detected through visual, tactile, and auditory means.
What should we change it to?
Wayfinding is facilitated by well-designed indoor and outdoor environments that incorporate clear paths of travel, along with constructed and natural navigation cues such as edges, landmarks, signage, surface textures, lighting, and acoustics that can be detected through visual, tactile, and auditory means, as well as through the use of digital, smart technology.
Why should we change it?
As digital and smart technologies become part of everyday wayfinding, they are being used more and more to help people plan safe and efficient routes. Many people with disabilities already rely on these tools to guide their travel. At the same time, these technologies are widely used by others as well—seniors, people who are neurodivergent, and anyone who wants clear directions and to get where they’re going without hassle. Because of this, the standard needs to reference their availability and relevance.
Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1774800441592_409
Heading id
s12.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
a) be in an accessible format for the types of signage identified in Clauses 12.2.1, 12.2.2, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, and 12.2.7.
What should we change it to?
a) be in an accessible format for the types of signage identified in Clauses 12.2.1, 12.2.2, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, and 12.2.7, with some exceptions.
Why should we change it?
There are exceptions listed in 12.2.6 note 2 and implied in 12.2.7 and, therefore, the exceptions must either be removed or acknowledged.
Heading text
12.2 Types of signage
Heading number portion
12.2
Item id
1774800583592_73
Heading id
s12.2.9
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Trailhead signs in outdoor spaces shall be provided at the start of trails and wherever trail conditions change significantly and include:
What should we change it to?
Signs in outdoor spaces shall be provided at the start of trails and wherever trail conditions change significantly and include:
Why should we change it?
Mor than one type of signs is discussed.
Heading text
12.2.9 Signs for outdoor spaces
Heading number portion
12.2.9
Item id
1774800727185_698
Heading id
s12.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
C. include alternative communication methods, i.e., an audible technology, braille booklet or similar alternate format where there is an established need.
What should we change it to?
C. include alternative communication methods, i.e., an audible technology, braille booklet or similar accessible format.
Why should we change it?
Per suggestion regarding removal of the definition of “alternate format”, changing the word to “accessible”. It is often not possible to know in advance whether accessible formats will be required, and accessibility should always be the goal, regardless of level of need.
Heading text
12.3 Quality of information
Heading number portion
12.3
Item id
1774801003875_329
Heading id
s12.6.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note 1: Information signs should be placed in stairwells to identify all entry and exit points. Note 2: Floor numbers should be displayed on each level at both the top and bottom of staircases, as well as on handrails.
What should we change it to?
A) Information signs should be placed in stairwells to identify all entry and exit points. B) Floor numbers should be displayed on each level at both the top and bottom of staircases.
Why should we change it?
These requirements should be part of the standard, not just separate notes. The reference to signs on handrails was removed as it is too problematic.
Heading text
12.6.3 Stairs
Heading number portion
12.6.3
Item id
1774801217673_517
Heading id
s12.7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Note 2: In some cases, signs that include variable messages may display tactile elements for the permanent portion of the sign message. Note 3: Variable information may be presented in an alternate accessible format where appropriate.
What should we change it to?
Note 2: In some cases, signs that include variable messages shall display tactile elements for the permanent portion of the sign message. Note 3: Variable information shall be presented in an accessible format.
Why should we change it?
According to the clause quoted below, this is required. “Tactile signs shall: c) include an alternative communication method, such as audible technology, braille or large print booklets, or other digital assistive technologies, when containing large amounts of information, particularly in high-traffic areas or when the sign’s location makes providing tactile elements impractical or unsafe;”
Heading text
12.7.1 Tactile sign design and build elements
Heading number portion
12.7.1
Item id
1774801384695_681
Heading id
s12.11.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note: Large text is defined as having a point size of 18 points or 14 points bold and larger, while regular text is consistent with font sizes usually found in body text.
What should we change it to?
Remove note.
Why should we change it?
A definition of “large print” creates more consistency.
Heading text
12.11.6 Colour factors
Heading number portion
12.11.6
Submission ID
65025
Submitted by
president@blindcanadians.ca
Submitted on
Sun, 03/29/2026 - 12:34
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65026's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774801897334_75
Heading id
s6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
While specific, as a practitioner in the planning and design of the built environment, I will struggle to implement much of the this section in any consistent way There are several ‘general statements’ that, when applied, will actually conflict with one another, and a practitioner would be forced into picking ‘one over another’ without guidance, relying on personal preference, rather than a technical standard. As such, what we are already seeing across Canada, namely, different applications of the same item through interpretation, will continue to proliferate and will lead to differing practices and applications from place to place, negating any attempts by this publication to create a ‘consistent standard.’ I would very much appreciate the opportunity to speak to the technical committee in depth about these items, as they are too numerous to list along with all the potential pitfalls/variants they create. Contact info: Peter.truch@me.com, (778)215-3879.
What should we change it to?
I will cite just one example of conflict, and how it causes issues in a somewhat circular fashion. I don’t necessarily propose a specific solution here, as I believe it should come from a consensus basis from the committee. This situation is specifically referring to outside, on a street corridor at a intersection or road crossing. A truncated dome tactile pad at a ramp letdown in Canada currently has (covering most situations) three different colours in practice. Most certainly, there are more with ‘one-offs’ that people can point to elsewhere beyond these three. The three colours that are all, generally speaking, compliant with surface contrast are yellow, safety red, and a rust/dirt red. The current draft standards do not specify a specific colour, only the contrast. However, there is a clause that suggest the colour should also correspond to the societal implications of meaning. So, is the intent of a truncated dome tactile pad a warning, or to stop before proceeding? This clause is important, as there are technical standards in Canada, in the form of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices in Canada (MUTCDC) produced by others that specify colours for those purposes. (Red means stop, yellow means warning). Hence, this document should specify what the intent is of the purpose of this device, then choose a corresponding colour. The confusion is furthered when within this standard, it is assumed that a directional wayfinding tactile pad CANNOT be yellow, to avoid confusion with a truncated dome warning tactile pad. This then applies that a truncated dome pad should be yellow, yet, much of central and eastern Canada regions use red or rust as the colour for the tactile. However, referring back to the MUTCDC, is a directional tactile indicator then not a warning? Or is it something else? Would yellow not be an appropriate colour for such a device? Irrespective, the MUTCDC specifies specific colours for our transportation system (which includes sidewalks and pathways) and should be a considered parallel standard that needs to be followed. Either way, said devices must provide specific contrast on different surface types and colours, specifically concrete (sidewalks) and asphalt (sometimes sidewalks, walking, paths, and multi-use paths). Finally, one must also consider the practical implications of what is currently being manufactured versus what could be in the future. Most manufacturers in Canada do not produce a significant variety of colours in each of the truncated dome and directional indicators that offer both the contrast and the durability for our climates. There are many many more examples like this, regarding positioning, placement, etc. that I have identified within this draft guide that will cause real problems for implementation, and the standard does not provide specificity to one to apply the standard effectively and consistently.
Why should we change it?
As outlined above with one example (I have identified many more), many technical components as outlined within this standard are not specific enough to be applied in a consistent, harmonized way across Canada, and will lead to further divergence in practice across the country. There will not be consistency from region to region, province to province, city to city, even from corner to corner in the same location. This is quite the opposite of this standard to harmonize and meet the needs of all persons. Again, I would like to speak in more detail with ASC to all of the items I have identified in my review of this draft standard. I believe with some focused discussion and thought, along with conscious decision making, we can dramatically improve this standard to allow for a harmonized approach across Canada.
Heading text
7. Scope
Heading number portion
7.
Item id
1774802066774_740
Heading id
s10.1.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
More specificity regarding 50 lx is required.
What should we change it to?
Statements about exactly how to measure this, the uniformity ratio, the surface area to measure, and more.
Why should we change it?
To ensure that lighting practitioners have proper guidance, and that other practitioners (e.g. municipal staff) have a specific guide that they can point to and ensure that the intent and practicality of the intent of lighting is met.
Heading text
10.1.5 Exterior lighting
Heading number portion
10.1.5
Item id
1774802168430_165
Heading id
s11.3.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Some of these items are in conflict with guidelines and current practices with respect to road safety and transportation engineering.
What should we change it to?
Needs to be determined; some of the items are in contrast with one another.
Why should we change it?
To ensure consistency.
Heading text
11.3.1 Additional specifications for exterior paths of travel
Heading number portion
11.3.1
Item id
1774802277368_968
Heading id
s11.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
As per my comment on Section 10/11 in general, there are many conflicts within this section that need to be addressed.
What should we change it to?
Please contact me at peter.truch@me.com or (778) 215-3879 to discuss all of them, and to being to identify appropriate solutions.
Why should we change it?
Consistency.
Heading text
11.4 Tactile Walking Surface Indicator (TWSI)
Heading number portion
11.4
Item id
1774802352635_365
Heading id
s11
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Also as above, there are numerous conflicts when it comes to these standards and other standards that apply.
What should we change it to?
Please email peter.truch@me.com or call (778) 215-3879 to discuss.
Why should we change it?
Ensure consistent practices across Canada.
Heading text
12. Signage
Heading number portion
12.
Item id
1774802444148_711
Heading id
s12.10.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Temporary Construction Zones are entirely missed within this section.
What should we change it to?
These should be included.
Why should we change it?
Any temporary detour, sidewalk closure, etc. is next to impossible to navigate for a person with sight loss without providing additional guidance.
Heading text
12.10.2 Usage of audible signs
Heading number portion
12.10.2
Item id
1774802589461_919
Heading id
s12
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Several instances where maps should be required to be tactile maps as well.
What should we change it to?
This ensures that more members of the population have universal access to the map.
Why should we change it?
Non-tactile maps exclude some people from use.
Heading text
13. Maps (non-tactile)
Heading number portion
13.
Submission ID
65026
Submitted by
peter.truch@me.com
Submitted on
Sun, 03/29/2026 - 12:51
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65033's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774879420074_193
Heading id
s10.1.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
10.1.2 a. ii. colour temperature around 3000K also ADD 10.1.3 c. avoid the following: i. overly lighting a space (or using too much light - not sure the best wording)
What should we change it to?
10.1.2 a.ii. colour temperature at or less than 2700K using full spectrum lamps
Why should we change it?
10.1.2 b. ii. 1. 3000K is too cold a colour based on personal experience and anecdotal comments in groups for highly sensitive and autistic individuals. It triggers discomfort, headache, and migraine. 2. colour temperature does not adequately reflect the quality of light in terms of wavelengths emitted. 10.1.2 c i. Inexpensive LED lighting, an increasing concern for managing liability and security has led to the overuse of bright, cold fixtures. This is not yet addressed in building code or lighting standards and needs to be addressed to keep spaces accessible. I have outlined the arguments for the avoidance of short wavelength LED light in this post on Substack, including research studies to back up each recommendation. https://substack.com/@clarekumar/note/p-188275797?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=1oe30i I've copied the post into a Word file as well. Apologies, I will be adding alt text to each of the images later this week.
Heading text
10.1.2 General lighting design
Heading number portion
10.1.2
Item id
1774879852397_397
Heading id
heading-29
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
10.1.2.1 Lighting design shall: a. ensure indoor spaces are lit to a minimum of 100 lx; b. ensure outdoor spaces are lit in compliance with Clause 10.1.5;
What should we change it to?
Add a. ensure indoor spaces are lit to a minimum of 100 lx, and not more than X b. ensure outdoor spaces are lit in compliance with Clause 10.1.5, and not more than X
Why should we change it?
We need protection from too much light. Before LED lighting, over-lighting a space was naturally prohibited by cost. Those controls are no longer there.
Heading text
10.1.2.1 Basic lighting considerations
Heading number portion
10.1.2.1
Item id
1774881201357_671
Heading id
s10.1.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
10.1.5.a maintain lighting levels of 50 lx over frequently used paths of travel, including walkways, paths of travel, stairs, and ramps, measured at the ground;
What should we change it to?
10.1.5.a maintain lighting levels of 50 lx and not more than X over frequently used paths of travel, including walkways, paths of travel, stairs, and ramps, measured at the ground;
Why should we change it?
people are being designed out of using spaces - roads, streets, restaurants, everywhere because of too much light. Colour temperature and intensity both matter.
Heading text
10.1.5 Exterior lighting
Heading number portion
10.1.5
Submission ID
65033
Submitted by
clare@clarekumar.com
Submitted on
Mon, 03/30/2026 - 10:36
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65036's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774890958915_971
Heading id
heading-31
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Corridors may require windows at the ends of corridors in unsprinklered buildings in accordance with the building code.
What should we change it to?
This clause should be revised and could include language about window treatments to reduce glare and harsh lighting transitions (e.g., films, Low-E coatings, reflective coatings, etc), rather than fully removing the window.
Why should we change it?
To harmonize with building code requirements.
Heading text
10.1.3.1 Preventing glare and shadow
Heading number portion
10.1.3.1
Item id
1774891059724_998
Heading id
s10.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Adding a reference to PAS 6463:2022 may be useful for designers and users of the standard.
What should we change it to?
General comment – PAS 6463:2022 Design for the mind – Neurodiversity and the built environment – Guide includes many good resources about colour and pattern selection that could be referenced by this standard. Further, the 2025 National Building Code of Canada in Sentence 3.8.3.6.(17) requires that “except for facilities for persons with cognitive disabilities such as dementia, doorways leading from a public corridor or a corridor used by the public that provide access to a public area or an exit shall be provided with a door or door frame that has a readily apparent visual contrast with adjacent wall surfaces.” It may be a good idea to include some guidance on cognitive disabilities, where colour may be overwhelming or create safety concerns, in addition to a general reference to PAS 6463.
Why should we change it?
Align with other best-practice guidelines and the building code.
Heading text
10.3 Colour choice
Heading number portion
10.3
Item id
1774891192579_440
Heading id
s11.3.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note #1 should be deleted or revised.
What should we change it to?
Suggest phrasing as: "Where technically feasible, avoid shared infrastructures, including cycling paths between access points to buses and public transportation, as they represent challenges for the accessibility community".
Why should we change it?
Was the TransLink and BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Design Guide for Bus Stops Adjacent to Cycling Infrastructure considered when this note was created? Additionally, the Transportation Association of Canada has published a guide Accommodating People with Disabilities and Island Platform Bus Stops which offers comparisons from multiple Canadian jurisdictions. There may be conditions where shared infrastructure cannot be avoided and one of the guidelines should be referenced as a way to mitigate concerns.
Heading text
11.3.1 Additional specifications for exterior paths of travel
Heading number portion
11.3.1
Item id
1774891344850_540
Heading id
s11.3.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Can Note #3 be expanded with a technical criteria, in addition to why decorative crosswalks should be avoided?
What should we change it to?
Not sure. Needs more background info.
Why should we change it?
Can note #3 explain why decorative crosswalks are to be avoided on busy roadways that have high-volumes of traffic? This requirement may be hard to enforce without a technical threshold for what constitutes high-volumes of traffic, and therefore, lead to inconsistent application.
Heading text
11.3.1 Additional specifications for exterior paths of travel
Heading number portion
11.3.1
Item id
1774891407133_356
Heading id
heading-54
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
11.4.2.2.(a)(i) - "at the tops of stairs and ramps"
What should we change it to?
"at the top of flights of stairs and ramps"
Why should we change it?
To harmonize with the National Building Code of Canada wording, which uses the word "flights" for stairs.
Heading text
11.4.2.2 Location
Heading number portion
11.4.2.2
Item id
1774891611557_509
Heading id
heading-62
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
11.4.2.5.5.(c) - "Have an increased depth to enhance detectability and allow for a longer stopping distance when no set-back is present"
What should we change it to?
Remove this clause, or expand it with a technical criteria for the depth/hazard.
Why should we change it?
CSA B651 and the 2025 National Building Code of Canada use a 600-650mm depth as the lower and upper limits for tactile attention indicators. Depths beyond that range would not be considered code-compliant and may not be enforceable. It would be beneficial to elaborate on what increased depths are useful and what basis this standard is using (i.e., is ISO 23599 depth being used here?)
Heading text
11.4.2.5.5 Dimensions of attention indicators
Heading number portion
11.4.2.5.5
Item id
1774891694610_707
Heading id
s12.2.8
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
12.2.8.(c) - "For example, hours of operation may be installed on the non-operational door swing when possible"
What should we change it to?
Delete the clause.
Why should we change it?
Subsequent sections of the standard discourage signage on doors, leaving it as a last resort. This note contradicts that.
Heading text
12.2.8 Requirements for different types of signage
Heading number portion
12.2.8
Item id
1774891827358_621
Heading id
s12.10.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
Clause 12.10.4.(a) and note #1 - "be automatic when audible information is transmitted"
What should we change it to?
Should incorporate language that automatic announcements are required to have a mute button or other means to cancel playback.
Why should we change it?
For people with neurodivergence, automatic announcements can be overstimulating. To strike a balance, a means to temporarily mute the announcements may be beneficial.
Heading text
12.10.4 Activation of audible signs
Heading number portion
12.10.4
Item id
1774891923911_714
Heading id
s12.10.5
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Technical such as dimensions or application of the standard
What should we change?
12.10.5.(a)
What should we change it to?
This standard should reference to CSA B44, which already covers audible announcements and chime tones for elevators.
Why should we change it?
To harmonize with CSA B44, "Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators". Right now, CSA B44 contains provisions for the use of chimes or other audible tones, rather than strictly voice prompts.
Heading text
12.10.5 Elevators
Heading number portion
12.10.5
Submission ID
65036
Submitted by
ameier@franclarchitecture.com
Submitted on
Mon, 03/30/2026 - 13:33
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65054's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774893218430_112
Heading id
heading-50
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Spell out TWSIs.
What should we change it to?
TWSI shall:
Why should we change it?
Tactile Walking Surface Indicator (TWSI) shall:
Heading text
11.4.1.1 General requirements
Heading number portion
11.4.1.1
Item id
1774893286069_862
Heading id
s12.2.7
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Small cap in "signs".
What should we change it to?
12.2.7 Parking Signs
Why should we change it?
12.2.7 Parking signs
Heading text
12.2.7 Parking Signs
Heading number portion
12.2.7
Submission ID
65054
Submitted by
myriam.mongeon@infc.gc.ca
Submitted on
Mon, 03/30/2026 - 13:56
Consent to contact
Yes

Individual 65057's submission

CAN-ASC-2.4 – Wayfinding and Signage
Feedback items
Item id
1774896179279_131
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Empowerment and independence: Wayfinding and signage in its various forms allow for autonomy and independent navigation, providing timely, accurate, and clear information in multiple formats when necessary.
What should we change it to?
Empowerment and independence: Wayfinding and signage in its various forms allow for autonomy and independent navigation, providing timely, accurate, and clear information in multiple formats when necessary, without the need for human assistance.
Why should we change it?
The additional language will further emphasize and reinforce that the fullest level of autonomy and independence is only achieved when individuals can access information and navigate spaces without the need for human or staff assistance. While human assistance must always be available where possible, solutions that rely upon it do not reflect true independence and autonomy for individuals with disabilities.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774896349448_144
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
User consultation: Implementers and designers carry out consultation with user groups when establishing/determining or altering the wayfinding and signage solutions.
What should we change it to?
User consultation: Implementers and designers carry out consultation and user testing with user groups representing a diversity of lived disability experiences and communication methods when establishing/determining or altering the wayfinding and signage solutions. Individuals with lived experience must be meaningfully engaged throughout projects from the outset, including design, testing, implementation, and evaluation phases.
Why should we change it?
Wayfinding and signage systems are most effective when they are designed with, not just for, people with disabilities. Multi-sensory design and user testing improve safety, predictability, and independence. Ensuring the robust inclusion of persons with disabilities for consultation and user testing throughout project development, implementation, and evaluation will better ensure solutions that reflect a diversity of lived experiences and the broader public benefit of accessible design.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774901821651_684
Heading id
s6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Everyone in Canada has the right to interact with environments effectively, safely, and efficiently. While the standard will apply initially only to federal facilities, other jurisdictions will be encouraged to adopt this standard and develop regulations to implement it. Consultation with and testing by persons with disabilities is an essential part of whatever is being considered
What should we change it to?
Add a word to the last sentence. Everyone in Canada has the right to interact with environments effectively, safely, and efficiently. While the standard will apply initially only to federal facilities, other jurisdictions will be encouraged to adopt this standard and develop regulations to implement it. Modified text starts here Added one word. Acceptance. Consultation, and acceptance, with and testing by persons with disabilities is an essential part of whatever is being considered.
Why should we change it?
this clause specifies that 'Consultation with and testing by persons with disabilities is an essential part' Anecdotally, we hear that persons with disabilities are consulted, but sometimes the information they share is not implemented. The suggestion is made that persons with disabilities, perhaps in the form of an accessibility advisory panel be given the authority to ensure that the information that they share is implemented. This is more aspirational than immediately practical, but perhaps this Committee is the correct place to begin to think about how to move from Hope to practice.
Heading text
6.1 Background
Heading number portion
6.1
Item id
1774901866497_217
Heading id
s6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
New trends in urban design relate to person-centered living. One of these is pedestrianization, i.e., where neighborhoods or streets are built for restricted pedestrian traffic only. This requires very careful consideration of the accessibility challenges it can inadvertently create.
What should we change it to?
There should be a separate section recommending standards for this new style of building and living. We have added this in our comments
Why should we change it?
The standard suggests that this new style of building and living creates new challenges, and so those that are currently apparent should be handled in this standard.
Heading text
6.1 Background
Heading number portion
6.1
Item id
1774901968762_791
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
We invite practitioners to not only include the information presented in this Standard but to also consider these principles to create more inclusive environments
What should we change it to?
Add two sentences. After designers have included this information, and considered these principles, they shall consult with an accessibility advisory panel to ensure that the information and principles are implemented to the satisfaction of this panel. In the event of a discussion about cost and difficulty of an accommodation, the Canadian legal precedent of ' reasonable accommodation and undue hardship' shall inform the decision
Why should we change it?
This follows on and conforms with the first editorial suggestion about the role of the accessibility advisory panel, ensuring that no barriers are created. Adding to the potential Committee discussion about the authority of a possible accessibility, advisory panel, is the idea that should disagreements occur about a particular accommodation, then the Canadian legal precedent mentioned shall be used to come to an accommodation that satisfies everyone.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774902014347_480
Heading id
s6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Best practices have been outlined to assist with consultation and decision-making regarding the universal impact, affordability, and usefulness of elements included in the design of indoor and outdoor spaces
What should we change it to?
Add a sentence These best practices apply not only to the design of new indoor or outdoor spaces, but also to the renovation of existing spaces.
Why should we change it?
It is not only at the design stage where best practices shall be used, but whenever the opportunity presents itself to fix existing barriers, and ensure no new barriers are created.
Heading text
6.1 Background
Heading number portion
6.1
Item id
1774902117736_242
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The practice of design involves more than consideration for usability.
What should we change it to?
Replace this sentence with two sentences.The practice of design and renovation, , involves more than consideration for usability. It also includes the principle of accessibility, ensuring that existing barriers are removed, and no new barriers are created.
Why should we change it?
The standards of wayfinding and signage must be thought of in more than when designing something new. In addition, usability is extremely important, and intersects with accessibility as long as the Accommodations is done to the satisfaction of everyone.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774902310167_839
Heading id
s6.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
j) Awareness and education: Implementers and designers provide ongoing public awareness of the purpose and intent of inclusive wayfinding and signage to ensure everyone understands their meaning and intent
What should we change it to?
j) Awareness and education: Implementers, designers, New text starts here or any person responsible for barrier-free and accessible signage and wayfinding shall New text ends here provide ongoing public awareness and education of the purpose and intent of inclusive wayfinding and signage to ensure everyone understands their meaning and intent
Why should we change it?
In case, implementers and designers do not ensure that there is public awareness of the intent, then this responsibility shall pass to the persons on site responsible for barrier free access.
Heading text
6.2 Guiding principles
Heading number portion
6.2
Item id
1774902540529_364
Heading id
s7.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
This Standard: ● recognizes the equity rights of persons with disabilities as Canadian citizens;
What should we change it to?
This Standard: ● recognizes the equity rights of persons with disabilities Remove the following As Canadian citizens.
Why should we change it?
It is not only Canadian citizens that require the standard to encounter a barrier-free living experience. It is also guests, visitors, tourists, and those in the process of wanting to or becoming Canadian citizens.
Heading text
7.1 General
Heading number portion
7.1
Item id
1774902802872_747
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
What we should change. Add a definition for accessibility advisory panel.
What should we change it to?
Add the following definition: Accessibility advisory panel A group of persons with disabilities at the federal, provincial, municipal, or facility level to test all accessibility features to ensure and verify with full authority that they are barrier-free. They will be chosen in the same way as Committee members for accessibility standards. Canada is chosen and will be involved at any stage, including design, implementation, renovation, or engagement when reports of barriers that are recurrent and important are received. They could be an accessibility advisory panel that is used for another standard. If the facility is large enough, the facility should have its own panel. If the facility is small, perhaps a group at the municipal, provincial or federal level could be used. If necessary, the Canadian litigation and precedent set in cases about reasonable accommodation and undue hardship shall inform any discussion where cost or difficulties are used as a reason not to implement accommodation.
Why should we change it?
This conforms with the suggestion 6.1 Background as to the implementation of an accessibility advisory panel Should the committee decide to have a conversation on this subject, this is the beginning of a definition of that panel, as a starting point.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774902861258_198
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Alternate format — Information presented in braille, in large print, electronically (e.g., on removable or portable media), or in an accessible format.
What should we change it to?
accessible or alternate format — Information presented in braille, in large print, electronically (e.g., on removable or portable media), or in a barrier-free way compatible with adaptive technology.
Why should we change it?
The terms, alternate, and accessible, formats are sometimes used interchangeably. We feel that, accessible, is a better term than, alternate. and this should be reflected in the definition.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774902910940_788
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Add a definition
What should we change it to?
Reasonable accommodation, and undue hardship This is a Canadian evolving legal concept in our courts that has created a framework or guidelines to help establish decisions about accommodations that might be costly or difficult to implement
Why should we change it?
This conforms with the suggestion 6.1 Background as to the implementation of an accessibility advisory panel Should the committee decide to have a conversation about this, then the concept of, reasonable accommodation and undue hardship, gives a framework in places where disagreements might occur.
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774903057317_690
Heading id
s9.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add a definition
What should we change it to?
Continuous improvement Continuous improvement is a process aimed at consistent improvement, using incremental and well-defined steps to receive feedback, evaluate, change, and continue until chosen targets are reached.
Why should we change it?
There are sections of the standard that call for feedback, as,Implementing standards is not once and done. The suggestion is that the process of continuous improvement, and the spirit that it invokes, be used as a process or guiding principle when feedback loops and improvements are implemented
Heading text
9.1 Definitions
Heading number portion
9.1
Item id
1774903144534_403
Heading id
s9
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
lighting and contrast
What should we change it to?
Add 10.5. User testing and approval 10.5.1 Testing body The testing body shall be either users selected by statistically significant methods, or an accessibility advisory panel, if one is available for this facility. 10.5.2 Testing Add every stage where barriers might exist, or be created, the testing body shall be asked to test all the lighting parameters, including, but not limited to, usability, luminance, glare, shadows, tone, position, color, and contrast, and report to the authorities that have jurisdiction to remediate any barriers of their findings to the satisfaction of everyone
Why should we change it?
Lighting can be complicated to ensure that it actually works, due to the interplay of factors that might not be apparent to a person who is just planning the lighting. For example, the intersection of hallways, windows, and colors of decorative elements, such as carpets or tiles, can impact whether or not lighting actually works. For this reason, testing must be done by the person who actually uses this facility, or if possible, by an accessibility advisory panel.
Heading text
10. General requirements for lighting and contrast
Heading number portion
10.
Item id
1774903798986_515
Heading id
s11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add a sentence after Wayfinding is facilitated by well-designed indoor and outdoor environments that incorporate clear paths of travel, along with constructed and natural navigation cues such as edges, landmarks, signage, surface textures, lighting, and acoustics that can be detected through visual, tactile, and auditory means
What should we change it to?
Add the following paragraph Recent smart technology has added to wayfinding by enabling the creation of navigation cues available in accessible format on a smart device. The cues are created, using lidar, photos, GPS or beacons as landmarks, by persons or organizations interested in wayfinding. There are also technologies that recognize and interpret addresses, street signs, surroundings, paths, doorbells, doors, knobs, signage, obstacles, and give immediate , real-time feedback to the user through tactile, visual, or audible signals.
Why should we change it?
As this smart technology evolves, and it is evolving rapidly, more and more persons with disabilities will supplement and inform their path of travel to ensure safe and efficient wayfinding. It is well known that adaptive technologies, used by persons with disabilities, are also used by other groups, such as seniors, persons who are neurodivergent, and people who just want to get there the first time, without problems, quickly. For these reasons, it is imperative that the standard lead and guide this new technology with a Canadian perspective
Heading text
11.1 General
Heading number portion
11.1
Item id
1774904704267_603
Heading id
s11.3.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
iii) incorporate distinctive surface materials, such as tiles, at intersections or key decision points in outdoor plazas to help users identify critical areas and make informed navigation choices;
What should we change it to?
iii) in outdoor plazas, incorporate distinctive surface materials, such as tiles, at intersections or key decision points to help users identify critical areas and make informed navigation choices;
Why should we change it?
As this section is about paved roads, jumping, too, outdoor plazas break the flow of information. For this reason, the words, outdoor plaza, should be at the beginning, to set the frame for the rest of the clause.
Heading text
11.3.1 Additional specifications for exterior paths of travel
Heading number portion
11.3.1
Item id
1774905134154_461
Heading id
s10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
The Committee might start a Conversation to Add the following new sections: 11.5 Person first living, pedestrian-centric, and car-free areas 11.5.1 Introduction New trends in urban design relate to person-centered living. One of these is pedestrianization, i.e., where neighborhoods or streets are built for restricted pedestrian traffic only, cars are banned, and bikes, e-bikes, and scooters are tightly regulated. This requires very careful consideration of the accessibility challenges to wayfinding and signage. 11.5.2 Monitoring barriers using systems of announcements a. Local traffic monitoring and notifying programs shall be encouraged to report on participation at popular, pedestrian-friendly areas, paying particular attention to those times when they become crowded, giving more information to the ability of a person with a disability to make their own individual decision about safe wayfinding. Example: The CJOH traffic report. The Spark Street mall has over half a million people attending, with people shoulder to shoulder. In this case, a person with a disability will use this information to adapt their wayfinding strategy to the particular circumstances of a crowded area. b. Automobile navigation applications that monitor the amount of car traffic in a popular or pedestrian-friendly area shall be encouraged to extrapolate from the vehicle traffic data to be able to estimate the pedestrian traffic. This information allows the person with a disability to assess which wayfinding tactic they might use for a safe journey. c. Wear temporary physical structures, such as extended patios for restaurants or sidewalk sales, are implemented; there shall be notification of the presence of these upon entering the area in an accessible way. They shall be constructed in such a way that they are cane-, detectable, and if possible, outer edges shall be rounded and soft, so that incorrect wayfinding shall not result in bodily harm.
What should we change it to?
NA
Why should we change it?
Given that these new areas of pedestrian-centric areas are more and more popular, the suggestion is made that the Committee might start a conversation about what standards are necessary for wayfinding and signage. An introduction has been included as a sample
Heading text
11. Wayfinding
Heading number portion
11.
Item id
1774905301107_336
Heading id
s10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
The Committee might start a Conversation to Add the following new sections: 11.6 Wayfinding in specialized areas a. Specialized facilities, such as transportation, terminals and hubs, sports venues, concert venues, auditoriums, shopping centers, hospitals, educational facilities, mixed-use complexes, shall engage accessibility, advisory panels, and appropriate professionals to create a plan, and then implement and maintain it, so that persons with disabilities can attend with successful navigation and wayfinding and avoid barriers.
What should we change it to?
NA
Why should we change it?
A suggestion is made that the Committee might start a conversation about large facilities with specialized requirements for wayfinding and signage. A sample introduction clause is included.
Heading text
11. Wayfinding
Heading number portion
11.
Item id
1774905400709_711
Heading id
s10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
The Committee might start a Conversation to Add the following new sections: 11.7 Wayfinding with Virtual, user-created maps 11.7.1 Introduction There are new technologies for persons with disabilities where virtual maps are created by users, volunteers, organizations, or facility managers. These maps can be downloaded into apps that give feedback to persons with disabilities. Lidar, Wi-Fi, GPS, beacons, and photos are currently used to create landmarks and paths for these virtual maps, and other technologies may be used in the future. 11.7.2 Facilitating virtual, user-created maps a. Facility managers, indoor and outdoor space authorities, accessibility advisory panels, and frequent users shall be provided with facilities, finances, backing, and resources to create virtual maps . Persons who participate in the creation of these virtual maps shall be fairly compensated for their time. B. Where these virtual maps are created, they shall be publicly announced in a prominent way. See. In a spirit of continuous improvement, any comment from a user of these virtual maps shall be encouraged and be easily sent to the appropriate person with authority to resolve and implement suggestions and improvements. 11.7.3 Facilitating for-profit companies to give virtual map assistance for free a. There are for-profit companies that provide wayfinding advice to persons with disabilities such as a I RA. In certain cases, they provide these services free of charge, such as certain airports. b. Facility managers or authorities in charge of indoor or outdoor spaces shall be encouraged to contact these companies to request that the areas under their control be included in the list of free services available.
What should we change it to?
NA
Why should we change it?
The suggestion is that the committee might start a conversation about these new technologies for wayfinding and signage. Sample clauses are included.
Heading text
11. Wayfinding
Heading number portion
11.
Item id
1774905677359_53
Heading id
s10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
The Committee might start a Conversation to Add the following new sections: 11.8 Proactive and regular updating of wayfinding and signage Accommodations a. Facility managers, or any other person, department, or organization responsible for effective, safe, and accessible wayfinding shall, on a regular basis, no less than once per year, survey users on a regular and random basis as to their live experience with wayfinding in the facility under their control and make the appropriate change to wayfinding in order to bring to zero the number of persons who cannot make a safe, barrier-free, effective, quick journey. These surveys and follow-up mitigation shall be done in a spirit of continuous improvement. b. In the case of discussions about costs and difficulty with wayfinding accommodations, the Canadian legal precedent on reasonable accommodation and undue hardship shall inform the decision.
What should we change it to?
NA
Why should we change it?
The suggestion is made that the committee might start a conversation about the idea that an accommodation is not once and done. Despite the best intentions of designers or any other person responsible for wayfinding and signage, there must be a feedback loop on a regular basis so that recurring reports of persons with disabilities who get lost, as well as frequent error reports, shall be resolved. Included our sample clauses.
Heading text
11. Wayfinding
Heading number portion
11.
Item id
1774905744023_518
Heading id
s12.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
h) have all audible and visual signs, including those provided for indoor or outdoor mapping tested by people who will use them to confirm usability and clarity; and
What should we change it to?
h) have all signs tested by people who will use them to confirm they are barrier-free, accessible, usable, and clear.; All signage and its accessible equivalent shall be approved by the accessibility advisory panel , if such a panel is available in a particular facility. Users for testing shall be selected in a statistically significant way.
Why should we change it?
If an accessibility advisory panel is available, then they shall test the signage, in addition to other users. For users that are selected to do testing, selecting them in a statistically significant way will ensure that the testing is successful.
Heading text
12.1 General
Heading number portion
12.1
Item id
1774905795721_761
Heading id
s12.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add two more clauses at the end. g) have the text and Braille associated with the symbol of access indicate that the route or amenity is accessible; h) have all audible and visual signs, including those provided for indoor or outdoor mapping tested by people who will use them to confirm usability and clarity; and i) be properly maintained.
What should we change it to?
Add two more clauses. j. To assist persons who are lost, prominent signs and those at intersections shall have on them appropriate accessible information that identifies the location of the sign, so that when assistance is contacted, the current location can be identified. k. Every prominent sign shall have on it appropriate accessible information about the name and contact information of the authority in charge of accessibility.
Why should we change it?
We suggest that adding these two features to signs would make any space a more user-friendly one.
Heading text
12.1 General
Heading number portion
12.1
Item id
1774905855688_379
Heading id
s12.2.8
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
c) for any vertical sign: i) not create an obstruction within the path of travel; ii) when installed outdoors, be placed in a location that does not intrude into the path of travel; and iii) maintain at least 70% luminance contrast with its surrounding environment, including mounting elements such as the pole.
What should we change it to?
Widen the use of this clause by removing “vertical” and “when installed outdoors.” c) for any sign: i) not create an obstruction within the path of travel; ii) be placed in a location that does not intrude into the path of travel; and iii) maintain at least 70% luminance contrast with its surrounding environment, including mounting elements, such as the pole.
Why should we change it?
The standard should apply to all signs, not just vertical signs. In addition, it might be difficult to define which sign is vertical, and which one is horizontal in a standard friendly manner. Perhaps this could be merged into 12.6.1 Location of signs.
Heading text
12.2.8 Requirements for different types of signage
Heading number portion
12.2.8
Item id
1774905926866_474
Heading id
s12.2.9
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
12.2.9 Trailhead Signs
What should we change it to?
NA
Why should we change it?
This section is only about trailhead signs; not other kinds of signs used in outdoor spaces.
Heading text
12.2.9 Signs for outdoor spaces
Heading number portion
12.2.9
Item id
1774906604465_786
Heading id
s12.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Change the last clause
What should we change it to?
Change the last clause, c) include alternative communication method so that every sign is available in accessible and barrier-free format.
Why should we change it?
There are two changes. 1. The format necessary for people with disabilities is made more general, based on function, described as accessible and barrier-free, as opposed to a narrower definition. 2. We removed the clause, where there is a need, as it is impossible to know when or where the need might be necessary, so an accessible format is necessary everywhere, all the time.
Heading text
12.3 Quality of information
Heading number portion
12.3
Item id
1774906659030_292
Heading id
s12.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Remove clauses in this suction that apply to the physical characteristics of the sign and not to accessibility
What should we change it to?
Remove these clauses. Note: In most outdoor settings, signs should be mounted to materials such as matte-coated metal, wood, or powder-coated aluminum posts. Retroreflective mounting is typically reserved for vehicular signs or remote locations where visibility at night is critical. d) be produced using materials that are durable and resistant to wear or vandalism (see also Clause 12.7.1); Note: Materials should be selected based on environmental conditions and anticipated public interaction. Outdoor and high-traffic areas may require UV-resistant, weatherproof, or anti-graffiti finishes and tamper-proof mounting systems. e) be applied (attached, secured, mounted, adhered) using materials that are durable and resistant to wear or vandalism (see also Clause 12.7.1);
Why should we change it?
This is a standard about accessibility, and so description of physical characteristics is not appropriate.
Heading text
12.4 Configuration
Heading number portion
12.4
Item id
1774906900079_88
Heading id
s12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
a) for signs meant to be read looking down (i.e., mounted on a standalone pole either parallel or angled to the ground), be located between 730 mm to 860 mm above the ground to allow viewing from a seated position;
What should we change it to?
Add the following: The text size, font, style, contrast, and color shall be suitable for those that are of median height, and in a standing position.
Why should we change it?
The sign must be suitable for those who are both in a seated position, and those who are standing, and so further away from the sign. For those that are further away from the sign, and in a standing position, the calculation of the character properties must be appropriate for that additional distance.
Heading text
12.6.1 Location of signs
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1774906951939_423
Heading id
s12.6.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
g) be cane-detectable for A-frame signs (see Clause 11.2.1); h) be cane-detectable for any signs mounted on posts (see Clause 11.2.1);
What should we change it to?
Replace it with one clause. g) be cane detectable when the sign is freestanding Why you think we should change it. This would be consistent with previous text, and of more general description.
Why should we change it?
NA
Heading text
12.6.1 Location of signs
Heading number portion
12.6.1
Item id
1774906990776_901
Heading id
s12.6.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note 2: Floor numbers should be displayed on each level at both the top and bottom of staircases, as well as on handrails.
What should we change it to?
Add a sentence at the end. The signage that describes the floor number shall also identify the location of the stairwell, allowing confirmation of position in difficult navigation situations, as well as information for assistance personnel.
Why should we change it?
A building of more than a small size will have multiple stairwells. A person in a stairwell might easily lose track of which stairwell they are in, and so having this information would ensure better wayfinding, as well as directional advice for persons who give assistance, such as emergency personnel.
Heading text
12.6.3 Stairs
Heading number portion
12.6.3
Item id
1774907170785_736
Heading id
s12.6.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Change the two notes in this section to actual clauses, lettered, a, and, B. And increase the mandatory level from should, too, shall. Note 1: Information signs should be placed in stairwells to identify all entry and exit points. Note 2: Floor numbers should be displayed on each level at both the top and bottom of staircases, as well as on handrails
What should we change it to?
a. Information signs shall be placed in stairwells to identify all entry and exit points. b. Floor numbers shall be displayed on each level at both the top and bottom of staircases, as well as on handrails.
Why should we change it?
This is an important subject, and so the mandatory level change from a note to a regular clause, as well as changing, should, too, shall, reflect this importance.
Heading text
12.6.3 Stairs
Heading number portion
12.6.3
Item id
1774907263076_206
Heading id
s12.7.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Add a clause after a) where there are double doors, be installed at a consistent location on either side of the doorway; b) where the wall space is not sufficient, be installed on the nearest adjacent wall; c) not be mounted on the door itself to reduce the collision hazard; d) be located on the wall on the latch side of doors or openings to ensure people can read it safely; e) be at a distance of 140 mm to 160 mm from the leading vertical edge of the door jamb; and f) have a clear wall area around the sign of 75 mm wide.
What should we change it to?
Add clause G. g. Be placed in such a way that if the adjacent door is opened fully, or at high speed, then a person accessing the tactile sign shall not be in danger of being smashed by the opening door.
Why should we change it?
The standard must protect the person accessing the sign in a fail-safe manner.
Heading text
12.7.2 Tactile signs at doors—location and mounting
Heading number portion
12.7.2
Item id
1774907363355_37
Heading id
s12.11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
12.11 Electronic and digital signage 12.11.1 General Electronic and digital signage falls into two categories: 1) Light Emitting Diode (LED) technologies that form letters and shapes via patterns of light-electrified dots. 2) Refreshable display technologies, such as plasma and LCD that are used for dynamic visual output. The lighting and formation of electronic and digital signage help increase its visibility, making it easily visible.
What should we change it to?
What we should change it to. Electronic signs are characterized by their ability to have the message easily changed by an administrator using an app, internally, using pre-programmed messages and images, such as a pedestrian walk, signal, or from some other control system, such as real-time information in an airport terminal. The actual display technology is evolving rapidly, and includes, plasma, LED, and LCD. Currently, plasma is rarely used, and LCD and LED are in a continuous race. The lighting and formation of electronic signage help increase its visibility, making it easily visible
Why should we change it?
The draft paragraph is somewhat out of date and does not focus on the advantages that electronic signage has. In addition, I feel that the distinction between electronic signs and digital signs is not necessary in this standard. Functionally, they are the same.
Heading text
12.11.1 General
Heading number portion
12.11.1
Item id
1774907601437_702
Heading id
s12.11
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Change the title. 12.11 Electronic and digital signage
What should we change it to?
12.11 Electronic Signage
Why should we change it?
Functionally, there is no difference between electronic and digital signage. It does not bring any additional information to this standard. If agreed, this change should be made everywhere in the section.
Heading text
12.11 Electronic and digital signage
Heading number portion
12.11
Item id
1774907769358_592
Heading id
s12.11.1
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Change clause b. Electronic and digital signage shall: a) allow sufficient time for viewers to view the message complying with Clause 12.11.7; b) be tested by people with various abilities to find the right amount of time needed; c) not present information in a scrolling or animated format;
What should we change it to?
b) be tested by people with various abilities to find the right amount of time needed, as well as other properties for usability. If users are selected, they shall be selected in a statistically significant way. If available, the accessibility advisory panel shall form part of the users who are doing the testing.
Why should we change it?
Electronic signage, being totally programmable, has an infinite number of ways of having the message displayed. The person doing the programming may or may not have the appropriate technical skills to decide on these display properties, and so users must test these properties, and if available, with the accessibility advisory panel.
Heading text
12.11.1 General
Heading number portion
12.11.1
Item id
1774907857371_83
Heading id
s12.11.2
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Electronic signs are mainly used where the information lasts for a long time and does not change, such as in a pedestrian walk signal, public facility schedule, or a directional symbol for wayfinding. Digital signage is mostly used where the message can be changed, such as: digital signage units for next-customer alert systems at kiosks and airport departure and arrival schedules. Electronic and digital signage displays more information than can be displayed on a fixed screen, such as the screen on a building directory. Electronic and digital signage use shall accomplish the same functions as traditional signs by displaying content that clearly conveys the message regardless of what is being displayed.
What should we change it to?
Remove this section
Why should we change it?
From the perspective of standards and accessibility, this is a description that does not meet the scope of this document. In addition, it is slightly out of date, as display technologies are chosen based on many factors, not necessarily whether the message is temporary, changeable, or permanent.
Heading text
12.11.2 Usage
Heading number portion
12.11.2
Item id
1774908201129_661
Heading id
s12.11.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
The screen size of the unit and the size of the chassis, the accessible controls, feedback confirmation for actions like pressing buttons, and easy maintenance and repair are crucial for accessibility.
What should we change it to?
Add a phrase at the beginning: New text starts here: for signage that is interactive and requires input from users, New text ends here: The screen size of the unit and the size of the chassis, the accessible controls, feedback confirmation for actions like pressing buttons, and easy maintenance and repair are crucial for accessibility
Why should we change it?
This standard focuses on the kind of signage that is not interactive, that is, does not require any input from the user. As this particular clause is about interactive signage, and this difference must be made clear.
Heading text
12.11.3 Design and installation
Heading number portion
12.11.3
Item id
1774908287404_103
Heading id
s12.11.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Replace illumination with luminance. 12.11.4 Illumination Electronic and digital signage illumination design shall:
What should we change it to?
12.11.4 luminance Electronic signage luminance design shall:
Why should we change it?
As described in the definition, luminous is the amount of light that a device, or in this case, pixel, emits. Illumination is the amount of light provided from other sources.
Heading text
12.11.4 Illumination
Heading number portion
12.11.4
Item id
1774908355770_993
Heading id
s12.11.4
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
12.11.4 Illumination Electronic and digital signage illumination design shall: a) favor models that allow for video brightness settings to be adjusted automatically according to local light conditions over those that have a pre-determined schedule, or which are user-defined; b) include a backlight feature to increase contrast and visibility in low-light conditions or in areas with high ambient lighting; and c) favor display technologies such as LED displays that economize on electricity consumption. Note 1: Factors such as the display size, the expected hours of operation, and pixel pitch are considered to help determine and lower energy consumption. Note 2: Pixel pitch is the relative proximity of the light pixels that make up an LED display. Pixel pitch will dictate the best viewing distance when accessing on-screen information.
What should we change it to?
Remove letter, C, and notes one and two c) favor display technologies such as LED displays that economize on electricity consumption. Note 1: Factors such as the display size, the expected hours of operation, and pixel pitch are considered to help determine and lower energy consumption.
Why should we change it?
Why you think we should change it: Letter C and notes one and 2 are about the amount of electricity used in different configurations. Given that this is a standard on accessibility, we feel this is out of scope. Note 2 is a very detailed technical paragraph about pixel pitch. Given that the standard requires usability, barrier-free access, we do not think it is necessary to prescribe how something is done, preferring to prescribe the result.
Heading text
12.11.4 Illumination
Heading number portion
12.11.4
Item id
1774908410142_194
Heading id
s12.11.6
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
12.11.6 Color factors Electronic and digital signage shall: a) avoid black backgrounds when placing LED-driven signage in the direct path of sunlight and instead use lighter backgrounds, to maintain the required ratios, indicated in this Clause; b) achieve a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for regular text and a ratio of 3:1 for large text when determining background and text colors; Note: Large text is defined as having a point size of 18 points or 14 points bold and larger, while regular text is consistent with font sizes usually found in body text.
What should we change it to?
Remove the note in this part of the standard. Note: Large text is defined as having a point size of 18 points or 14 points bold and larger, while regular text is consistent with font sizes usually found in body text.
Why should we change it?
As this is a section about color, there is no need to have specifications about the font size.
Heading text
12.11.6 Colour factors
Heading number portion
12.11.6
Item id
1774908952920_416
Heading id
s12.6.3
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
Note 2: Floor numbers should be displayed on each level at both the top and bottom of staircases, as well as on handrails.
What should we change it to?
Add a sentence at the end. Floor numbering or any other signage on handrails shall only be done if accessible signage is not close to the handrail. If signage on handrails is necessary, it shall be done in such a way that it does not harm a person using the handrail while grasping it.
Why should we change it?
If there is signage on a handrail, it might force a user to stop on the stairs in order to interpret the signage, potentially causing a hazard to other persons on the stairwell. For this reason, signage on handrail should be avoided if other places are available. Also, braille and raised text can sometimes have enough protrusion or sharp edges that might damage a hand that is sliding along, so care must be taken to avoid this.
Heading text
12.6.3 Stairs
Heading number portion
12.6.3
Item id
1774909091704_580
Heading id
s13.10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
General comments on the overall standard or a section such as things that are missing
What should we change?
13.10 Construction and maintenance Location plans shall: a) be constructed of durable materials, appropriate to their position and expected service life; b) be easy to clean, repair, and update, as and when required; c) undergo regular inspections to ensure they remain legible, conspicuous, comprehensible, and accurate; and d) be reviewed and revised as necessary whenever there is a change in the information within the area. What we should change it to. Add two clauses e. Every location, plan, and map shall have on it contact information for users to report missing or confusing information, or if the user became lost, what was their experience, and suggestions to changes to the map or location plan to ensure this does not happen again. f. All reports received by the authorities from users, reporting confusing maps or location plans or becoming lost, shall be shared with the accessible advisory panel, if such a panel is part of the facility.
What should we change it to?
Add two clauses e. Every location, plan, and map shall have on it contact information for users to report missing or confusing information, or if the user became lost, what was their experience, and suggestions to changes to the map or location plan to ensure this does not happen again. f. All reports received by the authorities from users, reporting confusing maps or location plans or becoming lost, shall be shared with the accessible advisory panel, if such a panel is part of the facility.
Why should we change it?
Cartographers work to the best of their ability, but it is the input of the user that is most important. In the spirit of continuous improvement, every user who finds the map confusing, or missing information in one way or another, or became lost, shall report that information to the appropriate authorities so that the map or location plan can be changed.
Heading text
13.10 Construction and maintenance
Heading number portion
13.10
Item id
1774909135546_371
Heading id
s13.10
What kind of suggestion are you making?
Editorial such as spelling, grammar, formatting and accessibility
What should we change?
Clarify the difference between location, plans, and maps.
What should we change it to?
Section 13 is about maps, but section 13.10 introduces location plans. The difference should be clarified, perhaps in the definitions. Or, perhaps, this section should have the words, location, plans, or maps, whenever one or the other is referenced.
Why should we change it?
This would bring clarity to the difference between location, plans, and maps.
Heading text
13.10 Construction and maintenance
Heading number portion
13.10
Submission ID
65057
Submitted by
VWilliams
Submitted on
Thu, 04/02/2026 - 08:49
Consent to contact
No

Pagination

  • First page first
  • Previous page Prev
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Current page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Next page Next
  • Last page last
Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply (required)

Share widget

Date modified:
2026-06-09

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn

Accessibility Standards Canada

  • Login
  • Create an account

About government

Government of Canada

  • All contacts
  • Departments and agencies
  • About government

Themes and topics

  • Jobs
  • Immigration and citizenship
  • Travel and tourism
  • Business
  • Benefits
  • Health
  • Taxes
  • Environment and natural resources
  • National security and defence
  • Culture, history and sport
  • Policing, justice and emergencies
  • Transport and infrastructure
  • Canada and the world
  • Money and finances
  • Science and innovation
  • Indigenous Peoples
  • Veterans and military
  • Youth
  • Manage life events

Brand

  • Social Media
  • Mobile Applications
  • About Canada.ca
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Site map
Top of Page
Symbol of the Government of Canada